Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765525›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Sociodemographic and reproductive risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome in a population of Brazilian women from the city of Ribeirão Preto: a cross-sectional study.

Ênio Luis Damaso, Heloisa Bettiol, Viviane Cunha Cardoso, Mariane Nunes de Nadai, Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés, Carolina Sales Vieira, Ricardo Carvalho Cavalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ênio Luis DamasoUniversidade de São Paulo Bauru Dental School Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health BauruSP Brazil Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru Dental School, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0498-1411
Heloisa BettiolUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8744-4373
Viviane Cunha CardosoUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2677-5600
Mariane Nunes de NadaiUniversidade de São Paulo Bauru Dental School Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health BauruSP Brazil Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru Dental School, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-7117
Elaine Christine Dantas MoisésUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-4544
Carolina Sales VieiraUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2933-5755
Ricardo Carvalho CavalliUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5010-4914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify sociodemographic and reproductive risk factors associated with MetS in women in their fourth decade of life. Methods: Cohort study conducted on women born from June 1978 to May 1979 in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Sociodemographic, clinical, and obstetric data were collected by interview and clinical evaluation. Univariable and multivariable binomial logistic regression models were constructed to identify the risk factors of metabolic syndrome and the adjusted relative risk (RR) was calculated. Results: The cohort included 916 women, and 286 (31.2%) of them have metabolic syndrome. MetS was associated with lack of paid work (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.14-1.95), marital status of without a partner (RR 1.33; 95% CI 1.03-1.72), low educational level (less than 8 years of schooling [RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.23-2.41], 8 to 12 years of schooling [RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.06-1.76], when compared with more than 12 years of schooling), and teenage pregnancy (RR 2.00; 95% CI 1.45-2.77). There was no association between MetS, and the other covariates studied. Conclusion: Metabolic syndrome in a population of women in the fourth decade of life was associated with lack of employment, lack of a partner, low educational level, and teenage pregnancy.

Indexed as

Metabolic SyndromeAdultBrazilCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansRisk FactorsSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsUrban HealthCohort studyMetabolic syndromeObesityRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38765525
PMCPMC11075418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.