Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765508›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®): a success history and particularities of its use in Brazil.

Vanessa Merjane, Douglas Marcel Puricelli Perin, Patrícia Martins Gomes El Bacha, Beatriz Medicis Maranhão Miranda, Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt, Wagner Iared

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vanessa MerjaneUniversidade Federal de São Paul São PauloSP Brazil Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-0110
Douglas Marcel Puricelli PerinRadboud University Medical Center Nimegue Netherlands Radboud University Medical Center, Nimegue, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7308-0764
Patrícia Martins Gomes El BachaOncoclínicas Belo HorizonteMG Brazil Oncoclínicas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0303-2513
Beatriz Medicis Maranhão MirandaLucilo Maranhão Diagnósticos RecifePE Brazil Lucilo Maranhão Diagnósticos, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-3513
Almir Galvão Vieira BitencourtGrupo Dasa São PauloSP Brazil Grupo Dasa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0192-9885
Wagner IaredUniversidade Federal de São Paul São PauloSP Brazil Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6426-5636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BI-RADS® is a standardization system for breast imaging reports and results created by the American College of Radiology to initially address the lack of uniformity in mammography reporting. The system consists of a lexicon of descriptors, a reporting structure with final categories and recommended management, and a structure for data collection and auditing. It is accepted worldwide by all specialties involved in the care of breast diseases. Its implementation is related to the Mammography Quality Standards Act initiative in the United States (1992) and breast cancer screening. After its initial creation in 1993, four additional editions were published in 1995, 1998, 2003 and 2013. It is adopted in several countries around the world and has been translated into 6 languages. Successful breast cancer screening programs in high-income countries can be attributed in part to the widespread use of BI-RADS®. This success led to the development of similar classification systems for other organs (e.g., lung, liver, thyroid, ovaries, colon). In 1998, the structured report model was adopted in Brazil. This article highlights the pioneering and successful role of BI-RADS®, created by ACR 30 years ago, on the eve of publishing its sixth edition, which has evolved into a comprehensive quality assurance tool for multiple imaging modalities. And, especially, it contextualizes the importance of recognizing how we are using BI-RADS® in Brazil, from its implementation to the present day, with a focus on breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiology Information SystemsBrazilFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMammographyBI-RADS®BrazilBreast neoplasmsHistoryScreening

Identifiers

PMID38765508
PMCPMC11075429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.