Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765483›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024

Quantitative accuracy of lung function measurement using parametric response mapping: A virtual imaging study.

Amar Kavuri, Fong Chi Ho, Mobina Ghojogh-Nejad, Saman Sotoudeh-Paima, Ehsan Samei, W Paul Segars, Ehsan Abadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amar KavuriCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States.
Fong Chi HoCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States.
Mobina Ghojogh-NejadCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States.
Saman Sotoudeh-PaimaCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States.
Ehsan SameiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States.
W Paul SegarsCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States.
Ehsan AbadiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Department of Radiology, Duke University, United States.

Funding

Genetic Epidemiology of COPDU01HL089897 · NHLBI · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI CRAPO, JAMES D · 2007 to 2021
$56.9M
Genetic Epidemiology of COPDU01HL089856 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SILVERMAN, EDWIN K · 2007 to 2021
$20.7M
TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
Accuracy and Precision in CT Quantification of COPD Through Virtual Imaging TrialsR01HL155293 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ABADI, EHSAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155293NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089856NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089897NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parametric response mapping (PRM) is a voxel-based quantitative CT imaging biomarker that measures the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by analyzing both inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. Although PRM-derived measurements have been shown to predict disease severity and phenotyping, their quantitative accuracy is impacted by the variability of scanner settings and patient conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability of PRM-based measurements due to the changes in the scanner types and configurations. We developed 10 human chest models with emphysema and air-trapping at end-inspiration and end-expiration states. These models were virtually imaged using a scanner-specific CT simulator (DukeSim) to create CT images at different acquisition settings for energy-integrating and photon-counting CT systems. The CT images were used to estimate PRM maps. The quantified measurements were compared with ground truth values to evaluate the deviations in the measurements. Results showed that PRM measurements varied with scanner type and configurations. The emphysema volume was overestimated by 3 ± 9.5 % (mean ± standard deviation) of the lung volume, and the functional small airway disease (fSAD) volume was underestimated by 7.5±19 % of the lung volume. PRM measurements were more accurate and precise when the acquired settings were photon-counting CT, higher dose, smoother kernel, and larger pixel size. This study demonstrates the development and utility of virtual imaging tools for systematic assessment of a quantitative biomarker accuracy.

Indexed as

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCOPDLung CT biomarkerParametric response mappingPRMQuantitative CTVirtual imaging trialsXCAT

Identifiers

PMID38765483
PMCPMC11100024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.