Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765435›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Vancomycin Flushing Syndrome: A Case Report.

Shitij Shrivastava, Shashwat Shrivastava

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shitij ShrivastavaInternal Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, USA.
Shashwat ShrivastavaCardiothoracic Surgery, New York University, New York City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycin is a bactericidal antibiotic used for various infections but can cause hypersensitivity reactions, including vancomycin flushing syndrome (VFS) and anaphylaxis. VFS, previously known as red man syndrome, is a pseudoallergic reaction characterized by flushing, erythema, and pruritus. We present a case of VFS in a female patient with recurrent Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections receiving vancomycin for back abscesses. Following the second dose, she developed a pruritic rash on her face, neck, and torso, which resolved with treatment. The differential diagnosis included hydromorphone allergy, ruled out due to previous tolerance. Anaphylaxis was unlikely due to the absence of respiratory distress, hypotension, or angioedema. Management involved discontinuing vancomycin, administering corticosteroids and antihistamines, and monitoring for anaphylaxis. The patient was transferred for surgical intervention and alternative antibiotic therapy. This case highlights the importance of recognizing and managing VFS, the significance of differential diagnoses, and the need for enhanced documentation and clinical support in managing vancomycin hypersensitivity reactions.

Indexed as

clinical infectious medicinehypersensitivitypharmacologyvancomycinvancomycin flushing syndrome

Identifiers

PMID38765435
PMCPMC11101207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.