Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765260›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Three years' interventional neurology experience in Turkey with the Thrombite thrombectomy device in large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation: safety, efficacy, and clinical outcome.

Çetin Kürşad Akpınar, Erdem Gurkas, Atilla Ozcan Ozdemir, Hasan Doğan, Ayşenur Önalan, Serhan Yıldırım, Zülfikar Memiş, Emrah Aytaç, Bilgehan Atılgan Acar, Muhammed Nur Öğün and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Çetin Kürşad AkpınarSamsun Tranining and Research Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Samsun University, Samsun, Türkiye.
Erdem GurkasKartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Health Sciences University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Atilla Ozcan OzdemirEskisehir Osmangazi University Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Hasan DoğanSamsun Tranining and Research Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Samsun University, Samsun, Türkiye.
Ayşenur ÖnalanKartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Health Sciences University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Serhan YıldırımKocaeli City Hospital, Stroke Center, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Zülfikar MemişHaseki Training and Research Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Health Sciences University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Emrah AytaçFırat University Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Elazığ, Türkiye.
Bilgehan Atılgan AcarSakarya University Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Muhammed Nur ÖğünAbant İzzet Baysal University Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Bolu, Türkiye.
Özlem AykaçEskisehir Osmangazi University Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Zehra Uysal KocabaşEskisehir Osmangazi University Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Türkan AcarSakarya University Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Halil Alper EryılmazSakarya University Hospital, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Berkhan TopaktaşDepartment of Public Health, Amasya University, Amasya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While the Thrombite device differs from the Solitare stent with its Helical open-side structure feature, it shows great similarity with its other features. We assessed the Thrombite device's effectiveness and safety in this study. Materials and methods: The study was a retrospective analysis of patients who were included in the Turkish Interventional Neurology database and who had mechanical thrombectomy with the Thrombite device as the first choice between January 2020 and January 2023. The type of study is descriptive research. Result: Using the Thrombite thrombectomy device, 525 patients received treatment. The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 13, the median initial Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (ASPECT) score was 8, and the mean patient age was 68.6+11.7 years. Between the groin puncture and the successful recanalization, the median time was 34 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 15-45). 48.2% (modified treatment in cerebral infarction; mTICI) 2b/3% and 33.9% (mTICI 2c/3) were the first-pass recanalization rates. In the end, 87.7% of patients had effective recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b/3). In the "first-pass" subgroup, the favorable functional result (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) was 51.8%, while it was 41.6% for the entire patient population. The rate of embolization into new territory/different territory were 2.1/0.1%. 23 patients (4.5%) had symptomatic hemorrhage. Conclusion: The Thrombite device showed a good safety profile and high overall successful recanalization rates in our experience.

Indexed as

acute strokefirst pass complete reperfusionmechanical thrombectomytechniquethrombectomy device

Identifiers

PMID38765260
PMCPMC11100768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.