Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38765050›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Impact of regulatory capital on bank interest margins: Moderating role of default risk.

Munni Begum, Mohammed Mizanur Rahman, Mohammad Omar Faruq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Munni BegumDepartment of Accounting and Finance, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammed Mizanur RahmanDepartment of AIS, Comilla University, Cumilla, 3506, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Omar FaruqDepartment of AIS, Comilla University, Cumilla, 3506, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent pandemic and aftermath debate regarding bank interest margins deserve special attention and have become policy dialogue in emerging economies. However, the previous literature's findings were largely inconclusive and ignored influential variables such as the impact of default risk on bank interest margins. Using a two-step system GMM estimation considering 32 Bangladeshi commercial banks from 2000 to 2022, we produce robust evidence that higher regulatory capital restrictions reduce the bank interest margin, while increased default risk induces the bank interest margin. The impact intensity during the COVID pandemic is higher than in the pre-COVID period. Moreover, we find the synergy effect of regulatory capital and default risk assists in reducing the bank interest margin. Bank margin persistently fell during the capital market crash period, whereas it rose in the financial crisis period. We cast several robustness tests to confirm our main findings. These findings could generate important implications for bank stakeholders and policymakers.

Indexed as

Bank interest marginDefault riskfinancial crisisGMM estimationRegulatory capital

Identifiers

PMID38765050
PMCPMC11096925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.