Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764963›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Emergence characteristics comparing endotracheal tube to reinforced laryngeal mask airway during endoscopic sinus surgery - A randomised controlled study.

Vasanth Raokadam, Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan, George S Bouras, Alex Zhang, Alkis Psaltis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vasanth RaokadamDepartment of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8773-0732
Venkatesan ThiruvenkatarajanDepartment of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4654-9608
George S BourasDepartment of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-4186
Alex ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6210-3336
Alkis PsaltisDepartment of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2967-1855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: During endoscopic sinus surgery, anaesthetic conditions significantly impact the intraoperative surgical field and bleeding during emergence. While the endotracheal tube (ETT) has been traditionally used in sinus surgery, a reinforced laryngeal mask airway (RLMA) that produces less upper airway stimulation may result in smoother emergence. Methods: A randomised controlled trial of 72 patients undergoing elective sinus surgery was conducted, with the allocation of airway technique to either ETT with a throat pack or RLMA. The primary outcome measure was emergence time, measured by time to opening eyes on commands at the cessation of anaesthesia, and the secondary outcomes were time to removal of airway device, remifentanil use, procedure times, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the RLMA grade of blood contamination. The continuous variables were analysed using Student's Results: There was no significant difference in the emergence time between the ETT and RLMA groups ( Conclusions: RLMA comparable to ETT in terms of emergence time. The RMLA group had lower remifentanil use, anaesthesia duration and fewer postoperative adverse events such as cough and throat pain.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiaemergence timeendoscopic sinus surgeryendotracheal tubelaryngeal masksparanasal sinusesreinforced

Identifiers

PMID38764963
PMCPMC11100652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.