Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764961›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Effective concentration (EC50) of sevoflurane for intraocular pressure measurement in anaesthetised children with glaucoma: A dose-finding study.

Elayavel Ravichandran, Nitika Goel, Babita Ghai, Vikas Saini, Sushmita Kaushik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elayavel RavichandranDepartment of Anaesthesia, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5626-432X
Nitika GoelDepartment of Anaesthesia, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6572-0311
Babita GhaiDepartment of Anaesthesia, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-332X
Vikas SainiDepartment of Anaesthesia, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-4984
Sushmita KaushikDepartment of Ophthalmology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9175-5497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Sevoflurane, a preferred anaesthetic for children, exhibits a dose-dependent reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP). However, consensus is lacking regarding optimal end-tidal sevoflurane concentration for safe IOP measurement. This study aimed to identify the concentration at which IOP measurement could be attempted without inducing movements in paediatric patients after inhalational induction. Methods: Two paediatric groups (1-12 months and 12-36 months) with glaucoma undergoing examination under anaesthesia were recruited. After induction with 8% sevoflurane and 100% oxygen, the first child had an end-tidal sevoflurane concentration maintained at 2% for 4 min, followed by IOP measurement. Success was defined as 'no movement', and subsequent concentrations (adjusted in 0.2% steps) were determined using the Dixon and Massey method based on the previous patient's responses. Results: The study included 75 children. The effective concentration of sevoflurane causing 'no movement' during IOP measurement in 50% of the study population for successful IOP measurement was 1.98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63, 2.17, Conclusion: In paediatric patients, a higher end-tidal sevoflurane concentration of 2% is needed for IOP measurement in 1-12 months age group compared to 0.5% required in 12-36 months age group, achieving success in 50% of the study population.

Indexed as

Childrendose-finding studyglaucomaintraocular pressuresevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID38764961
PMCPMC11100655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.