Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764954›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Comparison of genicular nerve block with adductor canal block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: A randomised controlled trial.

Sandeep S N Sujatha, Kapil Gupta, Sushil Guria, Priyanka H Chhabra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandeep S N SujathaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0449-2813
Kapil GuptaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5593-5506
Sushil GuriaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-0002
Priyanka H ChhabraDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9436-6123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Genicular nerve block (GNB) is beneficial in early ambulation and faster patient discharge since it selectively blocks articular branches and is motor-sparing. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided GNB with adductor canal block (ACB) in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: This randomised, double-blind study was conducted on 38 adults undergoing arthroscopic ACLR. Patients in Group GNB ( Results: NRS scores at rest and physical activity at 24 h were similar in both the groups ( Conclusion: US-guided GNB has an analgesic efficacy similar to US-guided ACB for patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR.

Indexed as

Adductor canal blockanalgesiaanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionbupivacainegenicular nerve blocknerve blockpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID38764954
PMCPMC11100646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.