Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764936›Full record

ArticlePatient related outcome measures2024

Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD PCORI-Funded Research.

Natalia A Warren, Steven L Maskin, Varadraj Gurupur, Deidre A Rector, Diana Adelman, Susan Howell, John McAree, Ruthie Dibble, Celia Carlisano, David P Maconi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient related outcome measures, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diagnostic methods for managing dry eyes.World journal of methodology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Natalia A Warren *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
Steven L Maskin *Dry Eye and Cornea Treatment Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Varadraj Gurupur *Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Deidre A Rector *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
Diana Adelman *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
Susan Howell *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
John McAree *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
Ruthie Dibble *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
Celia Carlisano *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
David P Maconi *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
Dirk Schrotenboer *Dry Eye Spa of West Michigan, Holland, MI, USA.
Maria Jaimes *Dry Eye and Cornea Treatment Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Nancy Marte *Dry Eye and Cornea Treatment Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Theresa Carlisano *Not A Dry Eye Foundation, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.
Claire Toland *Dry Eye and Cornea Treatment Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jongik Chung *Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3607-9657
Sandra L CremersJohns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Glenn S CorbinWyomissing Optometric Center, Inc, Wyomissing, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although affecting an estimated 35% of the population, Dry Eye is not well understood by patients and the medical community. As a result, both in research and clinical settings, diagnostic and treatment protocols tend to be non-specific, ad hoc, and inadequate, with a narrow industry-driven focus. The purpose of this convening was to propose a research roadmap that orients Dry Eye researchers toward a comprehensive patient-centered approach to diagnosing and treating Dry Eye, Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and related comorbidities with a goal of improving clinical outcomes for Dry Eye/MGD patients. Methods: Sixteen participants, including Dry Eye/MGD patients, caregivers, and patient advocates together with a group of experts in Dry Eye, MGD and other fields identified gaps in research on Dry Eye and MGD diagnostic and treatment approaches (age range 20-80; male to female ratio of 7:11; patients: 7). During a 2-day virtual convening, participants were assigned to topic-specific focus-group sessions to discuss and develop research questions pertaining to Dry Eye and MGD. The research questions were compiled into a proposed patient-centered roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD research. Two additional participants contributed to the proposed roadmap following the convening. Results: The focus groups identified over 80 patient-centered research questions important to patients and other stakeholders and compiled these into a proposed research roadmap. Conclusion: The convened stakeholders aim to establish a cohesive and comprehensive patient-centered approach to treating Dry Eye, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, and comorbidities. The research roadmap will serve as a reference for researchers, educational institutions, clinicians, and others evaluating diagnostic and treatment protocols in Dry Eye and MGD.

Indexed as

dry eye diseaseMeibomian gland dysfunctionocular surface diseasepatient advocacypatient carepatient-centered research

Identifiers

PMID38764936
PMCPMC11099927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.