Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764857›Full record

ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2023

Traditional and Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Treatment via Telepractice for Residual Speech Sound Disorders Affecting /ɹ/: Pilot study.

Laura C Ochs, Megan C Leece, Jonathan L Preston, Tara McAllister, Elaine R Hitchcock

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06884943 (Randomized Trial of AI-Enhanced Maintenance Training With Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06884943 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial of AI-Enhanced Maintenance Training With Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2024 to 2029Enrolled76ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsAI-guided maintenance training with visual-acoustic biofeedback, Treatment as Usual (TAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Residual /ɹ/ Distortions.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura C OchsMontclair State University, Montclair, NJ.
Megan C LeeceSyracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Jonathan L PrestonSyracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Tara McAllisterNew York University, New York, NY.
Elaine R HitchcockMontclair State University, Montclair, NJ.

Funding

Biofeedback-Enhanced Treatment for Speech Sound Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial and Delineation of Sensorimotor SubtypesR01DC017476 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Tara McAllister · 2019 to 2026
$5.3M
Online assessment and enhancement of auditory perception for speech sound errorsR15DC019775 · NIDCD · MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HITCHCOCK, ELAINE RUSSO · 2021 to 2024
$945k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017476NIDCD NIH HHS R15 DC019775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the feasibility of telepractice delivery of a treatment package including visual-acoustic biofeedback and motor-based treatment for residual speech sound disorder affecting /ɹ/ in school-age children. The overall study used a single-case randomization design; however, this preliminary report will simply quantify changes in accuracy before and after completion of the treatment package. The present analysis did not differentiate between the relative contributions of biofeedback and motor-based treatments. Method: Seven children aged 9-14 received speech therapy for /ɹ/ distortions via telepractice. The study design consisted of three phases: baseline (four sessions), treatment (20 sessions), and post-treatment (three sessions). Treatment included two sessions weekly for a duration of 10 weeks. The participants received one motor-based/non-biofeedback session and one visual-acoustic biofeedback session per week. The order of treatment within each week was randomly determined prior to the start of therapy. Overall progress was assessed using untrained listeners' ratings of word probes administered in the baseline and posttreatment phases. Results: Findings revealed that six of the seven participants showed a clinically significant response to the overall treatment package, although the magnitude of individual responses varied across speech contexts (consonantal and vocalic) and participants. Conclusion: The present results suggest that a treatment combining visual-acoustic biofeedback and motor-based treatment for residual /ɹ/ errors treatment can be effectively delivered via telepractice. Considerations for technology setup and treatment protocols are provided.

Indexed as

residual speech sound disordersRhoticstelepracticevisual-acoustic biofeedback

Identifiers

PMID38764857
PMCPMC11101137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.