Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764746›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2024

Diagnosis and Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Japan: Psychiatric Specialist Survey.

Keisuke Nomoto, Osamu Takashio, Satoshi Matsuyama, Shingo Higa, Tempei Otsubo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keisuke NomotoMedical Affairs, Viatris Pharmaceuticals Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7469-2922
Osamu TakashioDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Showa University East Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi MatsuyamaMedical Affairs, Viatris Pharmaceuticals Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-3133-2890
Shingo HigaMedical Affairs, Viatris Pharmaceuticals Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9430-7809
Tempei OtsuboDepartment of Psychosomatic and Psychiatric Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a suboptimally managed chronic recurring psychiatric condition with a lifetime prevalence of 2.6% in Japan. We assessed the current status of GAD management in Japan. Patients and Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional study conducted through an anonymous web-based survey in Japan from December 12-16, 2022. Psychiatrists and psychosomatic medicine physicians who agreed to participate and saw ≥10 outpatients in the previous month were eligible. Survey questionnaire comprised 37 single/multiple choice, numerical entry, or open-ended questions in Japanese. Results: Among 509 participants (493 psychiatrists and 16 psychosomatic medicine physicians), 96.9% were aware of GAD. On average, 12.4 outpatients and 1.0 inpatient were diagnosed with GAD per physician per month. Of 433 physicians having patients diagnosed with GAD, 46.9% used operational diagnostic tools; among these, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria were used by 81.5% physicians. The majority (54.7%) of participants did not use a self-administered rating scale; depression scales were used more than anxiety scales. Among these 433 physicians, 96.8% used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for GAD management, and 79.2% used it as the first choice; of 431 physicians who prescribed drug therapy, 54.3% gave antidepressant monotherapy as first choice. The most frequent symptom in patients diagnosed with GAD was excessive anxiety/worry (96.5%); depression was the most commonly reported comorbidity (84.3%) as per physicians aware of GAD (N=508). Conclusion: This study illustrates that although GAD awareness is high among Japanese psychiatric specialists, GAD is not frequently diagnosed using operational diagnostic approaches. Due to a lack of Japanese guidelines for GAD diagnosis and treatment, diverse international guidelines are followed, with similar treatment paradigms as that of depression. This may not be an optimal approach given cultural/geographical differences. These findings highlight the need for uniform diagnosis and treatment recommendations for GAD management in Japan. Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000049572.

Indexed as

anxietyGADpsychiatristpsychosomatic medicine physiciansurvey

Identifiers

PMID38764746
PMCPMC11102089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.