Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764740›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2024

Persistent pneumothorax after laparoscopic appendectomy in a patient who had undergone radical esophagectomy 5 years before: possible relationship with vulnerability of the hiatus after esophagectomy: a case report.

Seiji Ishikawa, Masakazu Hayashida, Daizo Satoh, Shinji Mine, Izumi Kawagoe

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seiji IshikawaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5044-7789
Masakazu HayashidaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Daizo SatohDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Shinji MineDepartment of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Izumi KawagoeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pneumothorax is a well-known but relatively rare complication after laparoscopic surgery. Herein, we report a case of persistent pneumothorax after laparoscopic appendectomy. A 57-year-old male, with a history of minimally invasive esophagectomy and intrathoracic gastric tube reconstruction 5 years before, underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy. A chest X-ray taken on postoperative Day 1 revealed the development of the right pneumothorax, which took more than 3 days to resolve spontaneously. Although the mechanism of postoperative pneumothorax was unclear, it seemed likely that the air that had replaced carbon dioxide in the peritoneal cavity migrated into the thoracic cavity through the esophageal hiatus, which was not covered by the peritoneum or pleura after surgical resection. The present case, together with our previous similar case, suggests that a history of esophageal cancer surgery

Indexed as

case reportesophagectomylaparoscopic appendectomypneumothoraxpostoperative complication

Identifiers

PMID38764740
PMCPMC11102790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.