ArticleCureus2024
Bilateral Sternalis Muscles: The Clinical Significance of This Rare Discovery.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sternalis or rectus? An analysis of terminological usage based on case reports of the sternalis muscle.Anatomical science international · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report explores the physical characteristics and clinical significance of the sternalis muscle, an uncommon anatomical variation of the anterior thoracic wall. If present, the sternalis muscle may distort diagnostic images and can be associated with incorrect interpretation of such medical images, misdiagnoses, and even surgical complications. As such, enhancing clinicians' knowledge of this muscle and improving its recognition is of the utmost importance. In this case report, a rare bilateral sternalis muscle that was discovered during an educational human cadaveric dissection of a 73-year-old Black male is described. The right sternalis muscle fibres extended from the mid-sternal level to the right sternocostal arch, measuring 11.5 cm in length and 3.4 cm at its largest width. In contrast, the smaller left sternalis muscle fibres measured only 5.6 cm in length and 1.2 cm at its greatest width. This rare bilateral presentation of the sternalis muscle is documented in approximately one-third of all reported sternalis cases with an associated estimated prevalence as low as 1.7% among the general population. Serving as a reminder of the intricate anatomical complexities that continue to challenge and intrigue medical professionals, this report advocates for continued education of anatomical variations to enhance patient care and medical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.