Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764702›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Anemia Status Changes Among Patients With Obesity Following Bariatric Surgery.

Fahimeh Soheilipour, Delaram Eskandari, Jamileh Abolghasemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fahimeh SoheilipourMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Delaram EskandariMedicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Hazrat Rasoul Hospital, Tehran, IRN.
Jamileh AbolghasemiDepartment of Biostatistics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study aims to investigate trends in anemia severity among patients with pre-existing anemia who underwent bariatric surgery due to obesity. It also examines how different bariatric surgery techniques impact anemia outcomes. Methods This prospective study included 280 patients aged 18 to 65 with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery. The patients were categorized into three groups based on the type of surgery: sleeve gastrectomy, one-anastomosis gastric bypass, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Anemia severity was evaluated over a 12-month follow-up period. Chi-square tests were used to assess the homogeneity of baseline factors among the groups, and McNemar tests along with generalized estimating equations were used to compare anemia outcomes. Results Before surgery, the rates of moderate anemia across the three surgical groups ranged from 18.2% to 22.4%, with no cases of severe anemia observed. There was no significant difference among the groups (p=0.949). During the 12-month follow-up, the odds ratio for reducing anemia severity in the sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass groups were 2.13 and 1.91, respectively, compared to the one-anastomosis gastric bypass group. Additionally, the odds ratio for reducing anemia severity in patients with hypothyroidism was 1.84 compared to those without hypothyroidism. Conclusion The choice of bariatric surgery technique significantly affects anemia outcomes, with sleeve gastrectomy showing a higher success rate in reducing anemia severity. The role of hypothyroidism in anemia management also appears to be significant.

Indexed as

anemiabariatric surgeryobesityone-anastomosis gastric bypassroux-en-y gastric bypasssleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID38764702
PMCPMC11101909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.