Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764670›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

Mass Spectrometry-Based Analyses of Carbon Nanodots: Structural Elucidation.

Musbahu Adam Ahmad, Sri Sumarsih, Jia-Yaw Chang, Mochamad Zakki Fahmi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Musbahu Adam AhmadDepartment of Chemistry, Airlangga University, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2875-9572
Sri SumarsihDepartment of Chemistry, Airlangga University, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Jia-Yaw ChangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-6612
Mochamad Zakki FahmiDepartment of Chemistry, Airlangga University, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5430-9992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon nanodots (CNDs) are nanomaterials with ubiquitous applications in health for diagnosis and treatments. The key to enhancing the applications of carbon nanodots in various fields lies on how deep its structure is understood. Here, we review the mass spectroscopy (MS) techniques employed for carbon nanodot analysis. We aimed to revive the use of MS to support the structural elucidation of carbon nanodots. General techniques used in nanomaterials characterization include laser desorption/ionization (LDI), matrix-assisted LDI (MALDI), inductively coupled plasma (ICP), and electrospray ionization (ESI) MS. For CNDs characterization, LDI-MS, MALDI-MS, and ESI-MS were employed. The techniques required further instrumentations of time-of-flight (TOF), for MALDI, and TOF, quadrupole (Q), and tandem (MS/MS) for ESI. LDI-MS could be applied to prove the surface and core structural composition of carbon nanodots. Meanwhile, MALDI-MS was used to elucidate the surface structures of CNDs. Finally, ESI-MS could provide significant insight into the carbon nanodots' structural composition and bonding patterns. In summary, MS could be combined with other techniques to unambiguously elucidate the structure of carbon nanodots.

Identifiers

PMID38764670
PMCPMC11097173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.