Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764625›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Green Electrospun Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Gelatin-Based Nanofibrous Membrane by Incorporating 45S5 Bioglass Nanoparticles and Urea for Wound Dressing Applications: Characterization and In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluations.

Tülay Merve Temel-Soylu, Ceren Keçeciler-Emir, Taha Rababah, Cem Özel, Sevil Yücel, Yeliz Basaran-Elalmis, Dilan Altan, Ömer Kirgiz, İlke Evrim Seçinti, Ufuk Kaya and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functionalized nano SiORSC applied interfaces · 2026
    Article
  2. Impact of CeOGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tülay Merve Temel-SoyluFaculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5374-9316
Ceren Keçeciler-EmirFaculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye.
Taha RababahNutrition and Food Technology Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 3030, Jordan.
Cem ÖzelFaculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye.
Sevil YücelFaculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye.
Yeliz Basaran-ElalmisFaculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye.
Dilan AltanFaculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ömer KirgizFaculty of Veterinary, Department of Clinical Sciences, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, 31060 Hatay, Türkiye.
İlke Evrim SeçintiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, 31060 Hatay, Türkiye.
Ufuk KayaFaculty of Veterinary, Department of Biostatistics, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, 31060 Hatay, Türkiye.
Muhammed Enes AltuğFaculty of Veterinary, Department of Clinical Sciences, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, 31060 Hatay, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reports the fabrication and characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and gelatin (Gel)-based nanofiber membranes cross-linked with citric acid (CA) by a green electrospinning method in which nano 45S5 bioglass (BG) and urea were incorporated. Various combinations of PVA, gelatin, and BG were prepared, and nanofiber membranes with average fiber diameters between 238 and 595 nm were fabricated. Morphological, chemical, and mechanical properties, porosity, swelling, water retention, and water vapor transmission rate of the fabricated membranes were evaluated. PVA:Gel (90:10), 15% CA, and 3% BG were determined as the optimum blend for nanofiber membrane fabrication via electrospinning. The membrane obtained using this blend was further functionalized with 10% w/w polymer urea coating by the electrospray method following the cross-linking. In vitro biocompatibility tests revealed that the fabricated membranes were all biocompatible except for the one that functionalized with urea. In vivo macroscopic and histopathological analysis results of PVA/Gel/BG and PVA/Gel/BG/Urea treated wounds indicated increased collagenization and vascularization and had an anti-inflammatory effect. Furthermore, careful examination of the in vivo macroscopic results of the PVA/Gel/BG/Urea membrane indicated its potential to decrease uneven scar formation. In conclusion, developed PVA/Gel/BG and PVA/Gel/BG/Urea electrospun membranes with multifunctional and biomimetic features may have the potential to be used as beneficial wound dressings.

Identifiers

PMID38764625
PMCPMC11097359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.