Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764596›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

TransAnaNet: Transformer-based Anatomy Change Prediction Network for Head and Neck Cancer Patient Radiotherapy.

Meixu Chen, Kai Wang, Michael Dohopolski, Howard Morgan, David Sher, Jing Wang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meixu ChenMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Kai WangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Michael DohopolskiMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Howard MorganMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
David SherMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Jing WangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.

Funding

A Multifaceted Radiomics Model to Predict Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis for Involved Nodal Radiation TherapyR01CA251792 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Jonathan Sher, Jing Wang · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can compensate for the dosimetric impact of anatomic change during radiotherapy of head neck cancer (HNC) patients. However, implementing ART universally poses challenges in clinical workflow and resource allocation, given the variability in patient response and the constraints of available resources. Therefore, early identification of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who would experience significant anatomical change during radiotherapy (RT) is of importance to optimize patient clinical benefit and treatment resources. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of using a vision-transformer (ViT) based neural network to predict radiotherapy induced anatomic change of HNC patients. Methods: We retrospectively included 121 HNC patients treated with definitive RT/CRT. We collected the planning CT (pCT), planned dose, CBCTs acquired at the initial treatment (CBCT01) and fraction 21 (CBCT21), and primary tumor volume (GTVp) and involved nodal volume (GTVn) delineated on both pCT and CBCTs for model construction and evaluation. A UNet-style ViT network was designed to learn the spatial correspondence and contextual information from embedded image patches of CT, dose, CBCT01, GTVp, and GTVn. The deformation vector field between CBCT01 and CBCT21 was estimated by the model as the prediction of anatomic change, and deformed CBCT01 was used as the prediction of CBCT21. We also generated binary masks of GTVp, GTVn and patient body for volumetric change evaluation. We used data from 100 patients for training and validation, and the remaining 21 patients for testing. Image and volumetric similarity metrics including mean square error (MSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), dice coefficient, and average surface distance were used to measure the similarity between the target image and predicted CBCT. Results: The predicted image from the proposed method yielded the best similarity to the real image (CBCT21) over pCT, CBCT01, and predicted CBCTs from other comparison models. The average MSE and SSIM between the normalized predicted CBCT to CBCT21 are 0.009 and 0.933, while the average dice coefficient between body mask, GTVp mask, and GTVn mask are 0.972, 0.792, and 0.821 respectively. Conclusions: The proposed method showed promising performance for predicting radiotherapy induced anatomic change, which has the potential to assist in the decision making of HNC Adaptive RT.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiation therapyanatomy change predictionhead and neck cancerstransformer network

Identifiers

PMID38764596
PMCPMC11100917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.