ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2024
Genetic blockade of the activation of 26S proteasomes by PKA is well tolerated by mice at baseline.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PKA-Mediated Proteasome Activation Protects Against Cardiac Remodeling and Heart Failure During Systolic Overload.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Promoting proteostasis by cAMP/PKA and cGMP/PKG.Trends in molecular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveProteasome activation by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) was long suggested and recent studies using both cell cultures and genetically engineered mice have established that direct phosphorylation of RPN6/PSMD11 at Serine14 (pS14-RPN6) mediates the activation of 26S proteasomes by PKA. Genetic mimicry of pS14-RPN6 has been shown to be benign at baseline and capable of protecting against cardiac proteinopathy in mice. Here we report the results from a comprehensive baseline characterization of the Rpn6
methodWild type and homozygous S14A littermate mice were subjected to serial M-mode echocardiography at 1 through 7 months of age, to left ventricular (LV) catheterization via the carotid artery for assessment of LV mechanical performance, and to cardiac gravimetric analyses at 26 weeks of age. Mouse mortality and morbidity were monitored daily for up to one year. Males and females were studied in parallel.
resultsMice homozygous for S14A were viable and fertile and did not show discernible developmental abnormalities or increased mortality or morbidity compared with their Rpn6 wild type littermates by at least one year of age, the longest cohort observed thus far. Neither serial echocardiography nor hemodynamic assessments detected a remarkable difference in cardiac morphometry and function between S14A and wild type littermate mice. No cardiac gravimetric difference was observed.
conclusionThe findings of the present study indicate that genetic blockade of the activation of 26S proteasomes by PKA is well tolerated by mice at baseline. Therefore, the S14A mouse provides a desirable genetic tool for further investigating the in vivo pathophysiological and pharmacological significance of pS14-RPN6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.