ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2024
Cardiogenic pulmonary edema - is it lone cardiogenic? "Missing link" between hemodynamic and other existing mechanisms.
Review in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pilot study on AI-based voice analysis for monitoring patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Respiratory Support in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema: Clinical Insights from Cardiology and Intensive Care.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current traditional pathophysiologic concept of pulmonary edema of cardiogenic origin explains its development by a hydrostatic effect due to increased pulmonary capillary pressure resulting in fluid flux to alveolar and interstitial areas from capillaries. However, several experimental studies and clinical data of poor response to hemodynamic and diuretic treatment in many scenarios provide further evidence of the involvement of several other contributing factors to the development of cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Several experimental and clinical studies have found that sympathetic overactivity with elevated plasma catecholamine concentrations may play an important role in the development of cardiovascular-associated pulmonary edema. Catecholamine-induced pulmonary injury may be one of the key mechanisms in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema triggering proinflammatory cytokine overactivation, oxidative stress and myocardial injury. In the everyday treatment of acute heart failure, physicians should consider the possibility of other noncardiogenic mechanisms involved in the progression of acute pulmonary edema, particularly catecholamine overactivity, lymphatic drainage, inflammatory and oxidative stress, high surfactant protein. The classic, hemodynamic treatment approach in pulmonary edema with the coexistence of other contributing factors may not provide adequate clinical benefit during treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.