Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764527›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology2023

Early Mental Health Foundations: A Scoping Review of Reflective Functioning in Caregiver-Child Dyads.

Jonathan Jin, Rachel Goud, Huda Al-Shamali, Anja Dzunic, Tirzah Lyons, Matthew Reeson, Hannah Pazderka, Liz Dennett, Wanda Polzin, Yifeng Wei and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jonathan JinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-7215
Rachel GoudUniversity of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-320X
Huda Al-ShamaliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3995-7075
Anja DzunicUniversity of Alberta, School of Public Health, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7161-5414
Tirzah LyonsUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Education, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-7334
Matthew ReesonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5036-6604
Hannah PazderkaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3511-4652
Liz DennettJW Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0758-5411
Wanda PolzinLittle Warriors Be Brave Ranch, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9270-1239
Yifeng WeiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2007-300X
Peter H SilverstoneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5176-7074
Andrew J GreenshawDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9097-900X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International public health strategies indicate a need for equitable resources for wellness in younger children and their caregivers. Reflective functioning, a proxy for emotional regulation abilities, is a key area in this domain. As an emerging area, reflective functioning has not been mapped comprehensively and requires systematic investigation. This review examines "what qualitative and quantitative evidence is there for the value of reflective functioning assessment and intervention studies in caregiver-child dyads?" This scoping review focused on data published to September 2021, focusing on caregivers of children ≤36 months of age (including Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were followed. From 5162 initial articles, 608 papers were screened for full text yielding a final 181 papers. Only 69 studies included multiple ethnicities. Seven of the 69 studies included at least 1 Indigenous person. No studies were conducted in low- to middle-income countries, and no studies reported data on gender identity. This review comprises a novel and comprehensive mapping of the reflective functioning literature in terms of both assessment and intervention studies. The present mapping of the reflective functioning literature indicates the importance of health disparities in caregiver-child dyads (these include gaps and needs for future research). In relation to gaps, studies of adverse childhood experience, consideration of equity, diversity, and inclusion, and global mental health are underrepresented. Future research is needed to provide information on the relevance of gender identity and low- to middle-income countries in relation to the impact on reflective functioning in this context.

Identifiers

PMID38764527
PMCPMC11082638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.