Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764516›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2024

Modern Concepts of Restructured Meat Production and Market Opportunities.

Abdul Samad, Amm Nurul Alam, Swati Kumari, Md Jakir Hossain, Eun-Yeong Lee, Young-Hwa Hwang, Seon-Tea Joo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdul SamadDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-3363
Amm Nurul AlamDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-3718
Swati KumariDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3330-7821
Md Jakir HossainDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7663-9202
Eun-Yeong LeeDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-7349
Young-Hwa HwangInstitute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3687-3535
Seon-Tea JooDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5483-2828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restructured meat (RM) products are gaining importance as an essential component of the meat industry due to consumers' interest in health benefits. RM products imply the binding or holding of meat, meat by-products, and vegetable proteins together to form a meat product with meat's sensory and textural properties. RM products provide consumers with diversified preferences like the intake of low salt, low fat, antioxidants, and high dietary fiber in meat products. From the point of environmental sustainability, RM may aid in combining underutilized products and low-valued meat by adequately utilizing them instead of dumping them as waste material. RM processing technique might also help develop diversified and new hybrid meat products. It is crucial to have more knowledge on the quality issues, selection of binding agents, their optimum proportion, and finally, the ideal processing techniques. It is observed in this study that the most crucial feature of RM could be its healthy products with reduced fat content, which aligns with the preferences of health-conscious consumers who seek low-fat, low-salt, high-fiber options with minimal synthetic additives. This review briefly overviews RM and the factors affecting the quality and shelf life. Moreover, it discusses the recent studies on binding agents in processing RM products. Nonetheless, the recent advancements in processing and market scenarios have been summarized to better understand future research needs. The purpose of this review was to bring light to the ways of sustainable and economical food production.

Indexed as

hybrid meatmarket scenarioprocessing techniquerestructured meatsensory quality

Identifiers

PMID38764516
PMCPMC11097039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.