Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764225›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026

Exploring staff experiences and perceptions of patient-perpetrated violence in hospital settings: A qualitative study.

Dana Sammut, Liz Lees-Deutsch, Luul Ali, Jennifer Imasogie, Lavinia Nkundo, Nutmeg Hallett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dana SammutCentre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-4782
Liz Lees-DeutschCentre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7246-0503
Luul AliSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jennifer ImasogieSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lavinia NkundoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nutmeg HallettSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3115-8831

Funding

The Clive Richards Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore hospital staff experiences and perceptions of patient-perpetrated violence.

designDescriptive qualitative study.

methodsTwelve semi-structured interviews (June-August 2022) were held with a diverse sample of hospital nurses, doctors, allied health professionals, security and a non-clinical manager. The framework approach was used to organise and analyse data, using Attribution Theory as a theoretical lens.

resultsThree themes were identified: violence as (un)predictable, violence as (un)preventable and the cumulative toll of violence. In making sense of why patients become violent, participants described different 'types' of aggressive patients and variably attributed behaviours to situation, disposition or a combination of both. Regardless of perceived causal factors, staff overwhelmingly appeared to view violence as predictable. Participants also reflected on the wider structural problems underpinning violence, frequently alluding to their sense of relative powerlessness to initiate change. The cumulative toll of violence was a common thread, with staff describing their acquisition of 'resilience' and reflecting on its role in their responses to escalating situations.

conclusionsMany hospital staff are resigned to the inevitability of violence. The concept of staff 'resilience' following violence is not unproblematic, having the potential to serve as a guise for acceptance and as an additional variable for which staff are held accountable. When designing strategies, organisations should ensure that accountability for violence reduction is distributed across multiple levels. This study makes a novel contribution by exploring the perspectives of multiple staff groups working across diverse hospital settings, and adds to a sparse literature on this subject in the UK. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Efforts to address violence against healthcare staff need to be power-conscious, ensuring that accountability is distributed across multiple levels. REPORTING

methodThis study is reported in line with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNursing Staff, HospitalPersonnel, HospitalViolenceWorkplace ViolenceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchexposure to violencehealth personnelpatient assaultprofessional burnoutqualitativeverbal abuseworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID38764225
PMCPMC13068164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.