ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2024
Generation of sarconoids from angiosarcoma patients as a systematic-based rational approach to treatment.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug sensitivity testing of patient-derived bone sarcomas identifies selective kinase inhibitors for patients with refractory disease.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Organoids for disease modeling and treatment: state-of-the-art.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Three-dimensional bioprinting of patient-derived Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a novel platform for precision oncology and drug response profiling.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Gelatin-Based Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Organoids Recapitulate Patient Tumor Characteristics.Biomaterials research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Angiosarcoma is a rare subtype of malignant neoplasm originating from vascular or lymphatic endothelial cells; its low incidence has posed significant challenges for comprehensive investigations into its pathogenic mechanisms and the development of innovative treatment modalities through in vitro and in vivo models. Recent endeavors spearheaded by patient-partnered research initiatives have aimed to elucidate the intricacies of angiosarcomas by leveraging biological omics approaches, with the overarching objective of enhancing prognostic indicators and therapeutic options for this uncommon pathology. To bridge the gap between preclinical research and translational applications, we engineered angiosarcoma-derived organoids from surgically resected primary tumors, hereafter referred to as "sarconoids," as a proof-of-concept model. A novel protocol for the establishment of these sarconoids has been developed and validated. To ensure that the sarconoids faithfully recapitulate the heterogeneity and complexities of the patients' original tumors, including transcriptomic signatures, cell-type specificity, and morphological traits, exhaustive histological and transcriptomic analyses were conducted. Subsequently, we expanded the scope of our study to include an evaluation of a sarconoid-based drug screening platform; for this purpose, a drug library (AOD IX), supplied by the National Cancer Institute's Developmental Therapeutics Program, was screened using 96-well plates. Our findings suggest that sarconoids can be reliably generated from angiosarcoma patient-derived tissues and can serve as accurate models for evaluating therapeutic responses, thereby holding far-reaching implications for translational research and clinical applications aimed at advancing our understanding and treatment of angiosarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.