Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38764015›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024

Asking patients if they have any questions can help improve patient satisfaction with medical team communication in the emergency department.

Eleonora Dafne Frau, Dea Degabriel, Giorgia Luvini, Roberta Petrino, Laura Uccella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eleonora Dafne FrauInternal Medicine Department, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano -EOC - via Tesserete 46, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland.
Dea DegabrielInternal Medicine Department, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano -EOC - via Tesserete 46, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland.
Giorgia LuviniEmergency Medicine Department, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano - EOC - via Tesserete 46, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland.
Roberta PetrinoEmergency Medicine Department, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano - EOC - via Tesserete 46, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland.
Laura UccellaEmergency Medicine Department, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano - EOC - via Tesserete 46, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland. laura.uccella@eoc.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is well known that patient satisfaction with medical communication in the emergency department (ED) improves patient experience. Investing in good communication practices is highly desirable in the emergency setting. In the literature, very few studies offer evidence of effective interventions to achieve this outcome. Aim of the study is to evaluate whether encouraging emergency physicians to ask if patients have questions at the end of the visit would improve patient satisfaction with medical communication.

methodsThe physicians of two EDs in Lugano, Switzerland, were invited by various methods (mailing, newsletter, memo pens and posters, coloured bracelets etc.) to implement the new practice of asking patients if they had questions before the end of the visit. Patients discharged were consecutively enrolled. Participants completed the modified CAT-T questionnaire rating their satisfaction with medical communication from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent). Data such as age, means of arrival, seniority of the physician etc. were also collected. Statistical analysis was performed with Bayesian methodology. The results were compared with those of a similar study conducted one year earlier.

results517 patients returned the questionnaire. Overall, patients' satisfaction with communication in the ED was very good and improved from the previous year (percentage of fully satisfied patients: 68% vs. 57%). The result is statistically significant (C: I: 51.8 - 61.3% vs. 63.9 - 71.8% p = 0.000). Younger patients (< 30 ye22ars old) were slightly less satisfied. Waiting time did not affect perception of communication.

conclusionThis study implements a concrete way to improve patients' satisfaction with medical communication in the ED. The intervention targeted only one item of the CAT-T ("Encouraged me to ask questions") but it generated an overall perception of better communication from patients discharged from the ED. The study also confirms that there are some objective elements that can alter perception of quality of medical communication by patients (age, seniority of the physician), in agreement with the literature. In conclusion, focusing physicians' attention on asking patients whether they have questions before discharge helps improving overall patient satisfaction with medical communication in the ED. This may lead to changes in physicians' clinical practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency Service, HospitalPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandYoung AdultCommunicationEmergency departmentInterventionPatient experiencePatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38764015
PMCPMC11103855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.