Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38763969›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Oscillating latent dynamics in robot systems during walking and reaching.

Oiwi Parker Jones, Alexander L Mitchell, Jun Yamada, Wolfgang Merkt, Mathieu Geisert, Ioannis Havoutis, Ingmar Posner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oiwi Parker JonesApplied AI Lab, Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. oiwi@robots.ox.ac.uk.
Alexander L MitchellApplied AI Lab, Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mitch@robots.ox.ac.uk.
Jun YamadaApplied AI Lab, Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Wolfgang MerktDynamic Robot Systems Group, Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mathieu GeisertDynamic Robot Systems Group, Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ioannis HavoutisDynamic Robot Systems Group, Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ingmar PosnerApplied AI Lab, Oxford Robotics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

EPSRC EP/S002383/1EPSRC CDT EP/L015897/1Hubs and the EU H2020 780684ORCA EP/R026173/1UKRI/EPSRC Programme Grant EP/V000748/1UKRI/EPSRC RAIN EP/R026084/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensorimotor control of complex, dynamic systems such as humanoids or quadrupedal robots is notoriously difficult. While artificial systems traditionally employ hierarchical optimisation approaches or black-box policies, recent results in systems neuroscience suggest that complex behaviours such as locomotion and reaching are correlated with limit cycles in the primate motor cortex. A recent result suggests that, when applied to a learned latent space, oscillating patterns of activation can be used to control locomotion in a physical robot. While reminiscent of limit cycles observed in primate motor cortex, these dynamics are unsurprising given the cyclic nature of the robot's behaviour (walking). In this preliminary investigation, we consider how a similar approach extends to a less obviously cyclic behaviour (reaching). This has been explored in prior work using computational simulations. But simulations necessarily make simplifying assumptions that do not necessarily correspond to reality, so do not trivially transfer to real robot platforms. Our primary contribution is to demonstrate that we can infer and control real robot states in a learnt representation using oscillatory dynamics during reaching tasks. We further show that the learned latent representation encodes interpretable movements in the robot's workspace. Compared to robot locomotion, the dynamics that we observe for reaching are not fully cyclic, as they do not begin and end at the same position of latent space. However, they do begin to trace out the shape of a cycle, and, by construction, they are driven by the same underlying oscillatory mechanics.

Indexed as

RoboticsWalkingAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansLocomotionMotor Cortex

Identifiers

PMID38763969
PMCPMC11102915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.