ArticleScientific reports2024
Oscillating latent dynamics in robot systems during walking and reaching.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Cushioned Landing Strategies of Cats Based on Posture Estimation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensorimotor control of complex, dynamic systems such as humanoids or quadrupedal robots is notoriously difficult. While artificial systems traditionally employ hierarchical optimisation approaches or black-box policies, recent results in systems neuroscience suggest that complex behaviours such as locomotion and reaching are correlated with limit cycles in the primate motor cortex. A recent result suggests that, when applied to a learned latent space, oscillating patterns of activation can be used to control locomotion in a physical robot. While reminiscent of limit cycles observed in primate motor cortex, these dynamics are unsurprising given the cyclic nature of the robot's behaviour (walking). In this preliminary investigation, we consider how a similar approach extends to a less obviously cyclic behaviour (reaching). This has been explored in prior work using computational simulations. But simulations necessarily make simplifying assumptions that do not necessarily correspond to reality, so do not trivially transfer to real robot platforms. Our primary contribution is to demonstrate that we can infer and control real robot states in a learnt representation using oscillatory dynamics during reaching tasks. We further show that the learned latent representation encodes interpretable movements in the robot's workspace. Compared to robot locomotion, the dynamics that we observe for reaching are not fully cyclic, as they do not begin and end at the same position of latent space. However, they do begin to trace out the shape of a cycle, and, by construction, they are driven by the same underlying oscillatory mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.