Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38763960›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The challenge of adopting a collaborative information system for independent healthcare workers in France: a comprehensive study.

Laurent Gaucher, Céline Puill, Sophie Baumann, Sophie Hommey, Sandrine Touzet, René-Charles Rudigoz, Marion Cortet, Cyril Huissoud, Pascal Gaucherand, Corinne Dupont and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02593292 (Program of Research for the Optimization of a Supervised Patient Pathway for Expectant According to Risk in Obstetrics), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02593292 nacompletednot on this map

Program of Research for the Optimization of a Supervised Patient Pathway for Expectant According to Risk in Obstetrics

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2016 to 2018Enrolled1,532ConditionsPregnancyArmsPROSPERO, control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laurent GaucherPôle de santé publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France. laurent.gaucher01@chu-lyon.fr.
Céline PuillIndependent Midwife, 94120, Val de Marne, France.
Sophie BaumannMidwifery Department, EA 7285, Versailles Saint Quentin University, 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Sophie HommeyPôle de santé publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France.
Sandrine TouzetPôle de santé publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France.
René-Charles RudigozHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.
Marion CortetHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.
Cyril HuissoudHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, 69004, Lyon, France.
Pascal GaucherandResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008, Lyon, France.
Corinne DupontResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008, Lyon, France.
Frédéric MougeotCentre Max Weber, UMR 5283, Institut des Sciences de l'Homme, 69363, Lyon, France.

Funding

Direction Générale de l'offre de Soins 14-0454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the perception of an underutilised collaborative information system through qualitative research, utilizing semi-structured, in-depth interviews with independent midwives and physician. PROSPERO, is a collaborative information system designed to bridge the communication gap between community-based healthcare workers and hospital-based care teams for parturients in Lyon, France. Through 27 semi-structured in-depth interviews with midwives, obstetricians, and general practitioners, we identified key themes related to the system's adoption: implementation challenges, utilisation barriers, interprofessional dynamics, and hidden variables affecting system use. Participants recognised the potential of PROSPERO to improve information sharing and care coordination but expressed concerns about the system's integration into existing workflows, time constraints, and the need for adequate training and technical support. Interprofessional dynamics revealed differing perspectives between hospital and independent practitioners, emphasising the importance of trust-building and professional recognition. Hidden variables, such as hierarchical influences and confidentiality concerns, further complicated the system's adoption. Despite the consensus on the benefits of a collaborative information system, its implementation was hindered by mistrust between healthcare workers (i.e. between independent practitioners and hospital staff). Our findings suggest that fostering trust and addressing the identified barriers are crucial steps towards successful system implementation. The study contributes to understanding the complex interplay of factors influencing the adoption of collaborative healthcare technologies and highlights the need for strategies that support effective interprofessional collaboration and communication.ClinicalTrials ID NCT02593292.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleFranceHumansInformation SystemsInterprofessional RelationsMaleMidwiferyPregnancyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID38763960
PMCPMC11102904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.