ArticleScientific reports2024
Systematic in-silico evaluation of fibrosis effects on re-entrant wave dynamics in atrial tissue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atrial cardiomyopathy: from knowledge gaps to clinical impact : The role of the EmbRACE Network.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
- Optimal control of spiral waves in heterogeneous excitable media: non-monotonic efficacy of localized optogenetic inhibition.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms, mapping techniques and clinical applications.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Clinically Inferred Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Its Association with Atrial Fibrillation Subtypes: A Prospective Clinical and Cardiometabolic Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The interaction between sarcoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria: a novel mechanism for cardiac arrhythmia.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Hybrid Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: Bridging Mechanistic Understanding and Clinical Practice.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the key role of fibrosis in atrial fibrillation (AF), the effects of different spatial distributions and textures of fibrosis on wave propagation mechanisms in AF are not fully understood. To clarify these aspects, we performed a systematic computational study to assess fibrosis effects on the characteristics and stability of re-entrant waves in electrically-remodelled atrial tissues. A stochastic algorithm, which generated fibrotic distributions with controlled overall amount, average size, and orientation of fibrosis elements, was implemented on a monolayer spheric atrial model. 245 simulations were run at changing fibrosis parameters. The emerging propagation patterns were quantified in terms of rate, regularity, and coupling by frequency-domain analysis of correspondent synthetic bipolar electrograms. At the increase of fibrosis amount, the rate of reentrant waves significantly decreased and higher levels of regularity and coupling were observed (p < 0.0001). Higher spatial variability and pattern stochasticity over repetitions was observed for larger amount of fibrosis, especially in the presence of patchy and compact fibrosis. Overall, propagation slowing and organization led to higher stability of re-entrant waves. These results strengthen the evidence that the amount and spatial distribution of fibrosis concur in dictating re-entry dynamics in remodeled tissue and represent key factors in AF maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.