Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38763697›Full record

GuidelineGastroenterology2024

AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Endoscopic Eradication Therapy of Barrett's Esophagus and Related Neoplasia.

Joel H Rubenstein, Tarek Sawas, Sachin Wani, Swathi Eluri, Shailendra Singh, Apoorva K Chandar, Ryan B Perumpail, John M Inadomi, Aaron P Thrift, Alejandro Piscoya and 4 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Current Concepts for Diagnosing Non-Dysplastic and Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Joel H RubensteinCenter for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: clinicalpractice@gastro.org.
Tarek SawasDivision of Digestive and Liver Disease, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
Sachin WaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Swathi EluriDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Shailendra SinghDivision of Gastroenterology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia; Advanced Center for Endoscopy, West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Apoorva K ChandarDigestive Health Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ryan B PerumpailGenesis Health System, Bettendorf, Iowa.
John M InadomiDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Aaron P ThriftSection of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Alejandro PiscoyaHospital Guillermo Kaelin de la Fuente, Lima, Peru.
Shahnaz SultanDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Siddharth SinghDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
David KatzkaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Perica DavitkovDepartment of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
Validation & Pathology CoreU54CA163059 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RUBENSTEIN, JOEL H, WANG, THOMAS D · 2011 to 2022
$12.1M
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surveillance versus. Endoscopic Therapy for Barretts Esophagus with Low-grade Dysplasia: The SURVENT TrialU01DK129191 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VALERIE L DURKALSKI, NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2022 to 2026
$9.7M
Validation of Biomarkers for predicting Barrett's esophagus that will or will not: i) progress towards cancer, or ii) recur after ablationU01CA271867 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CHETAN BETTEGOWDA, AMITABH CHAK · 2022 to 2026
$4.9M
The Oral Microbiome for the Detection of Barretts EsophagusR01CA238433 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ABRAMS, JULIAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238433NCI NIH HHS U01 CA271867NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163059NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK129191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsBarrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) can be effective in eradicating BE and related neoplasia and has greater risk of harms and resource use than surveillance endoscopy. This clinical practice guideline aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia.

methodsThe Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients, conducted an evidence review, and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations regarding the use of EET in patients with BE under the following scenarios: presence of (1) high-grade dysplasia, (2) low-grade dysplasia, (3) no dysplasia, and (4) choice of stepwise endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or focal EMR plus ablation, and (5) endoscopic submucosal dissection vs EMR. Clinical recommendations were based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations.

resultsThe panel agreed on 5 recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. Based on the available evidence, the panel made a strong recommendation in favor of EET in patients with BE high-grade dysplasia and conditional recommendation against EET in BE without dysplasia. The panel made a conditional recommendation in favor of EET in BE low-grade dysplasia; patients with BE low-grade dysplasia who place a higher value on the potential harms and lower value on the benefits (which are uncertain) regarding reduction of esophageal cancer mortality could reasonably select surveillance endoscopy. In patients with visible lesions, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of focal EMR plus ablation over stepwise EMR. In patients with visible neoplastic lesions undergoing resection, the use of either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was suggested based on lesion characteristics.

conclusionsThis document provides a comprehensive outline of the indications for EET in the management of BE and related neoplasia. Guidance is also provided regarding the considerations surrounding implementation of EET. Providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to guide future research opportunities.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyAblation TechniquesClinical Decision-MakingEvidence-Based MedicineGastroenterologyHumansTreatment OutcomeBarrett’s EsophagusCryosurgeryEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsRadiofrequency Ablation

Identifiers

PMID38763697
PMCPMC11345740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.