Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38762892›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

Analysis of meiotic recombination in Drosophila simulans shows no evidence of an interchromosomal effect.

Bowen Man, Elizabeth Kim, Alekhya Vadlakonda, David L Stern, K Nicole Crown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bowen ManDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Elizabeth KimJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.
Alekhya VadlakondaDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
David L SternJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.
K Nicole CrownDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2595-3428

Funding

Chromosome structural variants in meiosis - Equipment supplementR35GM137834 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CROWN, KIMBERLY NICOLE · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM137834NIH HHS R35GM137834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome inversions are of unique importance in the evolution of genomes and species because when heterozygous with a standard arrangement chromosome, they suppress meiotic crossovers within the inversion. In Drosophila species, heterozygous inversions also cause the interchromosomal effect, whereby the presence of a heterozygous inversion induces a dramatic increase in crossover frequencies in the remainder of the genome within a single meiosis. To date, the interchromosomal effect has been studied exclusively in species that also have high frequencies of inversions in wild populations. We took advantage of a recently developed approach for generating inversions in Drosophila simulans, a species that does not have inversions in wild populations, to ask if there is an interchromosomal effect. We used the existing chromosome 3R balancer and generated a new chromosome 2L balancer to assay for the interchromosomal effect genetically and cytologically. We found no evidence of an interchromosomal effect in D. simulans. To gain insights into the underlying mechanistic reasons, we qualitatively analyzed the relationship between meiotic double-stranded break (DSB) formation and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly. We found that the SC is assembled prior to DSB formation as in D. melanogaster; however, we show that the SC is assembled prior to localization of the oocyte determination factor Orb, whereas in D. melanogaster, SC formation does not begin until the Orb is localized. Together, our data show no evidence that heterozygous inversions in D. simulans induce an interchromosomal effect and that there are differences in the developmental programming of the early stages of meiosis.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionChromosomes, InsectDrosophila simulansMeiosisAnimalsCrossing Over, GeneticDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDrosophilaFemaleMaleRecombination, GeneticSynaptonemal ComplexDrosophila simulansinversionmeiosis

Identifiers

PMID38762892
PMCPMC11304986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.