Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38762744›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2024

Parental hesitancy toward children vaccination: a multi-country psychometric and predictive study.

Hamid Sharif-Nia, Long She, Kelly-Ann Allen, João Marôco, Harpaljit Kaur, Gökmen Arslan, Ozkan Gorgulu, Jason W Osborne, Pardis Rahmatpour, Fatemeh Khoshnavay Fomani

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hamid Sharif-NiaPsychosomatic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Long SheSunway Business School, Sunway University, Sunway City, Malaysia.
Kelly-Ann AllenSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
João MarôcoWilliam James Centre for Research ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal.
Harpaljit KaurBusiness School, Taylor's University Lakeside Campus, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Gökmen ArslanDepartment of Psychological Counseling, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.
Ozkan GorguluDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey.
Jason W OsborneDepartment of Statistics, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
Pardis RahmatpourSchool of Nursing, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Fatemeh Khoshnavay FomaniNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. F.Khoshnava@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimUnderstanding vaccine hesitancy, as a critical concern for public health, cannot occur without the use of validated measures applicable and relevant to the samples they are assessing. The current study aimed to validate the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS) and to investigate the predictors of children's vaccine hesitancy among parents from Australia, China, Iran, and Turkey. To ensure the high quality of the present observational study the STROBE checklist was utilized.

designA cross-sectional study.

methodIn total, 6,073 parent participants completed the web-based survey between 8 August 2021 and 1 October 2021. The content and construct validity of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale was assessed. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were used to assess the scale's internal consistency, composite reliability (C.R.) and maximal reliability (MaxR) were used to assess the construct reliability. Multiple linear regression was used to predict parental vaccine hesitancy from gender, social media activity, and perceived financial well-being.

resultsThe results found that the VHS had a two-factor structure (i.e., lack of confidence and risk) and a total of 9 items. The measure showed metric invariance across four very different countries/cultures, showed evidence of good reliability, and showed evidence of validity. As expected, analyses indicated that parental vaccine hesitancy was higher in people who identify as female, more affluent, and more active on social media.

conclusionsThe present research marks one of the first studies to evaluate vaccine hesitancy in multiple countries that demonstrated VHS validity and reliability. Findings from this study have implications for future research examining vaccine hesitancy and vaccine-preventable diseases and community health nurses.

Indexed as

ParentsPsychometricsVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultAustraliaChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAustraliaChinaIranNursingPsychometricTurkeyVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID38762744
PMCPMC11102617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.