Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38762699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Balancing the books of nature by accounting for ecosystem condition following ecological restoration.

Tina Parkhurst, Rachel J Standish, Suzanne M Prober, Halina Kobryn, Michael Vardon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tina ParkhurstSchool of Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Australia. Tina.Parkhurst@murdoch.edu.au.
Rachel J StandishSchool of Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Australia.
Suzanne M ProberCSIRO Environment, Canberra, 2601, Australia.
Halina KobrynSchool of Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Australia.
Michael VardonFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, 2601, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demand for ecological restoration of Earth's degraded ecosystems has increased significantly since the adoption of The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in December 2022, with target 2 aiming to ensure that at least 30% of degraded ecosystems are under effective restoration by 2030. More recently, in December 2023, the Australian Parliament introduced the Nature Repair Act, which establishes a framework for the world's first legislated, national, voluntary biodiversity market. How can the effectiveness of these ambitious targets be measured? Natural Capital Accounting (NCA) provides a framework to measure changes in ecosystem condition that is applicable across ecosystems and potentially catalogue effects of restoration interventions to drive investment, improvement to practice, and ultimately, to better protect the Earth's ecosystems. However, the framework has not been tested in this context. In this progressive approach, we populated the leading global NCA framework with ecological data to quantify changes in ecosystem condition after restoration. In principle, NCA is fit for purpose, however, methodological refinements and ecological expertise are needed to unlock its full potential. These tweaks will facilitate adoption and standardisation of reporting as efforts ramp up to meet ambitious global restoration targets.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAustraliaEcologyEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationEcological condition indicatorsEcosystem accountingKunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity FrameworkNatural capital accountingNature Repair Act (2023)Nature Repair MarketSystem of Environmental-Economic Accounting

Identifiers

PMID38762699
PMCPMC11102552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.