Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38762694›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

Predicting recurrent chat contact in a psychological intervention for the youth using natural language processing.

Silvan Hornstein, Jonas Scharfenberger, Ulrike Lueken, Richard Wundrack, Kevin Hilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Silvan HornsteinDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany. silvan.hornstein@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0398-7096
Jonas ScharfenbergerInstitute of Information Systems, Leuphana University, Lueneburg, Germany.
Ulrike LuekenDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1564-4012
Richard WundrackDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2121-0982
Kevin HilbertDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7986-4113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chat-based counseling hotlines emerged as a promising low-threshold intervention for youth mental health. However, despite the resulting availability of large text corpora, little work has investigated Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications within this setting. Therefore, this preregistered approach (OSF: XA4PN) utilizes a sample of approximately 19,000 children and young adults that received a chat consultation from a 24/7 crisis service in Germany. Around 800,000 messages were used to predict whether chatters would contact the service again, as this would allow the provision of or redirection to additional treatment. We trained an XGBoost Classifier on the words of the anonymized conversations, using repeated cross-validation and bayesian optimization for hyperparameter search. The best model was able to achieve an AUROC score of 0.68 (p < 0.01) on the previously unseen 3942 newest consultations. A shapely-based explainability approach revealed that words indicating younger age or female gender and terms related to self-harm and suicidal thoughts were associated with a higher chance of recontacting. We conclude that NLP-based predictions of recurrent contact are a promising path toward personalized care at chat hotlines.

Identifiers

PMID38762694
PMCPMC11102489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.