Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38762496›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

"Unless someone sees and hears you, how do you know you exist?" Meanings of confidential conversations - a hermeneutic study of the experiences of patients with palliative care needs.

Tove Stenman, Ylva Rönngren, Ulla Näppä, Christina Melin-Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Confidential Conversations in Palliative Care: Capability, Vulnerability, and Relational Encounter.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tove StenmanDepartment of Health Sciences Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, S-831 25, Sweden. tove.stenman@miun.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1387-9152
Ylva RönngrenDepartment of Health Sciences Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, S-831 25, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-7866
Ulla NäppäDepartment of Health Sciences Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, S-831 25, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3075-0833
Christina Melin-JohanssonDepartment of Health Sciences Nursing Science, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, S-831 25, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9623-5813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with palliative care needs live with the reality of limited time due to illness or age, eliciting emotional and existential responses. A failure to address their existential needs can lead to significant suffering. A person-centred approach is paramount to effectively address these needs, emphasising holistic care and effective communication. Although existing communication models focus on predefined frameworks, a need exists to explore more spontaneous and confidential conversations between patients and nurses. Confidential conversations have the potential to build therapeutic relationships and provide vital emotional support, highlighting the need for further research and integration into palliative care practice. This study aims to more deeply understand the meaning of confidential conversations for patients with palliative care needs.

methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patients in the context of specialised palliative care. A hermeneutic analysis was used to gain a deeper understanding of the meanings of the conversations.

resultsThe patients had varying experiences and wishes concerning confidential conversations. They strived for self-determination in finding confidants, seeking trust and comfort in their interactions with nurses. Trust was crucial for creating a safe space where patients could express themselves authentically. In shared belonging, confidential conversations with a nurse provided validation and relief from life's challenges. Experiences of feeling unheard or rejected by a nurse could intensify loneliness, prompting individuals to withdraw and remain silent. Regardless of the motives behind their choices, it was crucial that patients felt respect and validation in their decisions. Their autonomy could thus be recognised, and they felt empowered to make decisions based on their unique preferences.

conclusionsPatients value trust and understanding, particularly in confidential conversations with nurses, which offer solace, validation and empowerment. However, indifference can increase patients' suffering, fostering self-doubt and reluctance to engage further. To address this, health care can prioritise empathic communication skills, offer ongoing support to nurses, and promote continuity in care through investment in training and resources. Additionally, adopting a person-centred approach in confidential conversations is crucial, considering patients' varying preferences.

Indexed as

CommunicationConfidential conversationsHome careHospiceNursingPalliative careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38762496
PMCPMC11102614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.