Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38762480›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Psychometric properties and criterion related validity of the Norwegian version of hospital survey on patient safety culture 2.0.

Espen Olsen, Seth Ayisi Junior Addo, Susanne Sørensen Hernes, Marit Halonen Christiansen, Arvid Steinar Haugen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Espen OlsenUiS Business School, Department of Innovation, Management and Marketing, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Seth Ayisi Junior AddoUiS Business School, Department of Innovation, Management and Marketing, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Susanne Sørensen HernesHospital of Southern Norway, Flekkefjord, Norway.
Marit Halonen ChristiansenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Arvid Steinar HaugenFaculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing and Health Promotion Acute and Critical Illness, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Ann-Chatrin Linqvist LeonardsenFaculty of Health, Welfare and Organization, Østfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway. ann.c.leonardsen@hiof.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have been conducted with the 1.0 version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) in Norway and globally. The 2.0 version has not been translated and tested in Norwegian hospital settings. This study aims to 1) assess the psychometrics of the Norwegian version (N-HSOPSC 2.0), and 2) assess the criterion validity of the N-HSOPSC 2.0, adding two more outcomes, namely 'pleasure of work' and 'turnover intention'.

methodsThe HSOPSC 2.0 was translated using a sequential translation process. A convenience sample was used, inviting hospital staff from two hospitals (N = 1002) to participate in a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Data were analyzed using Mplus. The construct validity was tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was tested using Average Variance Explained (AVE), and internal consistency was tested with composite reliability (CR) and Cronbach's alpha. Criterion related validity was tested with multiple linear regression.

resultsThe overall statistical results using the N-HSOPSC 2.0 indicate that the model fit based on CFA was acceptable. Five of the N-HSOPSC 2.0 dimensions had AVE scores below the 0.5 criterium. The CR criterium was meet on all dimensions except Teamwork (0.61). However, Teamwork was one of the most important and significant predictors of the outcomes. Regression models explained most variance related to patient safety rating (adjusted R

conclusionThe N-HSOPSC 2.0 had acceptable construct validity and internal consistency when translated to Norwegian and tested among Norwegian staff in two hospitals. Hence, the instrument is appropriate for use in Norwegian hospital settings. The ten dimensions predicted most variance related to 'overall patient safety', and less related to 'number of reported events'. In addition, the safety culture dimensions predicted 'pleasure at work' and 'turnover intention', which is not part of the original instrument.

Indexed as

Organizational CulturePatient SafetyPsychometricsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayReproducibility of ResultsSafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsHospitalHospital survey on patient safety cultureHSOPSCPatient safety culturePsychometric testingValidation

Identifiers

PMID38762480
PMCPMC11102629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.