Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38762450›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2024

The global relevance of locally grounded ethnobiology.

Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Irene Teixidor-Toneu, Chelsey Geralda Armstrong, Julián Caviedes, José Tomás Ibarra, Dana Lepofsky, Alex C McAlvay, Zsolt Molnár, R Mónica Moraes, Guillaume Odonne and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Álvaro Fernández-LlamazaresDepartament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia (BABVE), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain. alvaro.fernandezllamazares@uab.cat.
Irene Teixidor-ToneuIMBE, Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, Marseille, France.
Chelsey Geralda ArmstrongIndigenous Studies, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Julián CaviedesInstitut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA-UAB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
José Tomás IbarraECOS (Ecosystem - Complexity - Society) Co-Laboratory, Center for Local Development (CEDEL) & Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research (CIIR), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Villarrica, Chile.
Dana LepofskyDepartment of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Alex C McAlvayInstitute of Economic Botany, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA.
Zsolt MolnárHUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.
R Mónica MoraesInstituto de Ecología, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz, Bolivia.
Guillaume OdonneUAR 3456 LEEISA (Laboratoire Ecologie, Evolution, Interactions Des Systèmes Amazoniens), CNRS, Université de Guyane, IFREMER, Cayenne, France.
Melissa R PoeUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abolfazl Sharifian BahramanRange and Watershed Management Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
Nancy J TurnerSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche Labex CEBA: anr-10-labx-25-01Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1240070 and 1200291HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council IEK-CHANGES, 101117423Institut de Recherche pour le Développement ANR-CPJ contract number 402299/00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación CEX2019-000940-MMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación RYC2021-034198-INemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal NKFI K 131837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While ethnobiology is a discipline that focuses on the local, it has an outstanding, but not yet fully realized potential to address global issues. Part of this unrealized potential is that universalistic approaches often do not fully recognize culturally grounded perspectives and there are multiple challenges with scaling up place-based research. However, scalability is paramount to ensure that the intimate and context-specific diversity of human-environmental relationships and understandings are recognized in global-scale planning and policy development. Here, we identify four pathways to enable the scalability of place-based ethnobiological research from the ground up: local-to-global dialogues, aggregation of published data, multi-sited studies, and geospatial analyses. We also discuss some major challenges and consideration to encourage continuous reflexivity in these endeavours and to ensure that scalability does not contribute to unnecessarily decontextualizing, co-opting, or overwriting the epistemologies of Indigenous Peoples and local communities. As ethnobiology navigates multiple scales of time and space and seeks to increase its breadth, this study shows that the use of deliberately global approaches, when carefully nested within rich field-based and ecological and ethnographically grounded data, can contribute to: (1) upscaling case-specific insights to unveil global patterns and dynamics in the biocultural contexts of Indigenous Peoples and local communities; (2) bringing ethnobiological knowledge into resolutions that can influence global environmental research and policy agendas; and (3) enriching ethnobiology's field-based ethos with a deliberate global analytical focus.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalHumansGlobal environmental changeGlocalizationIndigenous and local knowledgeScalabilitySustainability

Identifiers

PMID38762450
PMCPMC11102124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.