ArticleJournal of lipid research2024
The importance of choosing the appropriate cholesterol quantification method: enzymatic assay versus gas chromatography.
Article in Journal of lipid research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Cluster of Three snoRNAs Including Jouvence Required in the Gut Determines Lifespan and Confers Neuroprotection Through Metabolic Parameters.Aging cell · 2026Article
- Laser-emission vibrational microscopy of microdroplet arrays for high-throughput screening of hyperlipidemia.Light, science & applications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholesterol is a major lipid of the animal realm with many biological roles. It is an important component of cellular membranes and a precursor of steroid hormones and bile acids. It is particularly abundant in nervous tissues, and dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism has been associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Huntington's diseases. Deciphering the pathophysiological mechanisms of these disorders often involves animal models such as mice and Drosophila. Accurate quantification of cholesterol levels in the chosen models is a critical point of these studies. In the present work, we compare two common methods, gas chromatography coupled to flame-ionization detection (GC/FID) and a cholesterol oxidase-based fluorometric assay to measure cholesterol in mouse brains and Drosophila heads. Cholesterol levels measured by the two methods were similar for the mouse brain, which presents a huge majority of cholesterol in its sterol profile. On the contrary, depending on the method, measured cholesterol levels were very different for Drosophila heads, which present a complex sterol profile with a minority of cholesterol. We showed that the enzyme-based assay is not specific for cholesterol and detects other sterols as well. This method is therefore not suited for cholesterol measurement in models such as Drosophila. Alternatively, chromatographic methods, such as GC/FID, offer the required specificity for cholesterol quantification. Understanding the limitations of the quantification techniques is essential for reliable interpretation of the results in cholesterol-related research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.