Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38762120›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2024

A Real-World Assessment of Stage I Lung Cancer Through Electronic Nose Technology.

Gaetano Rocco, Giorgio Pennazza, Kay See Tan, Stijn Vanstraelen, Marco Santonico, Robert J Corba, Bernard J Park, Smita Sihag, Matthew J Bott, Pierfilippo Crucitti and 23 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04734145 (Breathprinting), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04734145 active not recruitingnot on this map

Breathprinting (e-Nose) Technology for the Identification of Early-Stage Lung Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRan2021 to 2027Enrolled119ConditionsLung, Node, Lung CancerArmsBreathprinting test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Gaetano RoccoThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: roccog@mskcc.org.
Giorgio PennazzaDepartment of Engineering, Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Kay See TanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Stijn VanstraelenThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marco SantonicoDepartment of Science and Technology for Sustainable Development and One Health, Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Robert J CorbaThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Bernard J ParkThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Smita SihagThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Matthew J BottThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Pierfilippo CrucittiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
James M IsbellThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michelle S GinsbergDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Hallie WeissDepartment of Anesthesiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Raffaele Antonelli IncalziDepartment of Geriatrics, Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Panaiotis FinamoreDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Filippo LongoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro ZompantiDepartment of Engineering, Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Simone GrassoDepartment of Science and Technology for Sustainable Development and One Health, Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Stephen B SolomonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Alain VincentThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Alexa McKnightThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael CirelliThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Carmela VoliThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Susan KellyThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mario MeroneDepartment of Engineering, Unit of Computational Systems and Bioinformatics, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Daniela MolenaThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Katherine GrayThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
James HuangThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Valerie W RuschThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Manjit S BainsThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Robert J DowneyThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Prasad S AdusumilliThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David R JonesThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic nose (E-nose) technology has reported excellent sensitivity and specificity in the setting of lung cancer screening. However, the performance of E-nose specifically for early-stage tumors remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of E-nose technology in clinical stage I lung cancer.

methodsThis phase IIc trial (NCT04734145) included patients diagnosed with a single greater than or equal to 50% solid stage I nodule. Exhalates were prospectively collected from January 2020 to August 2023. Blinded bioengineers analyzed the exhalates, using E-nose technology to determine the probability of malignancy. Patients were stratified into three risk groups (low-risk, [<0.2]; moderate-risk, [≥0.2-0.7]; high-risk, [≥0.7]). The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of E-nose versus histopathology (accuracy and F1 score). The secondary outcome was the clinical performance of the E-nose versus clinicoradiological prediction models.

resultsBased on the predefined cutoff (<0.20), E-nose agreed with histopathologic results in 86% of cases, achieving an F1 score of 92.5%, based on 86 true positives, two false negatives, and 12 false positives (n = 100). E-nose would refer fewer patients with malignant nodules to observation (low-risk: 2 versus 9 and 11, respectively; p = 0.028 and p = 0.011) than would the Swensen and Brock models and more patients with malignant nodules to treatment without biopsy (high-risk: 27 versus 19 and 6, respectively; p = 0.057 and p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn the setting of clinical stage I lung cancer, E-nose agrees well with histopathology. Accordingly, E-nose technology can be used in addition to imaging or as part of a "multiomics" platform.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBiopsyDiagnosisE-noseLung cancerStage I

Identifiers

PMID38762120
PMCPMC11380592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.