Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38761385›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2024

The ASCENT Trial: a phase 2 study of induction and consolidation afatinib and chemoradiation with or without surgery in stage III EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Allison E B Chang, Andrew J Piper-Vallillo, Raymond H Mak, Michael Lanuti, Alona Muzikansky, Julia Rotow, Pasi A Jänne, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Scott Swanson, Cameron D Wright and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Targeting ClassicalCancers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Perioperative Therapy in Oncogene-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Strategies and Unanswered Questions.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Highlights of ASCO 2024.The oncologist · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Allison E B ChangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-3169-8337
Andrew J Piper-VallilloDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, United States.
Raymond H MakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Michael LanutiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Alona MuzikanskyMassachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7585-8181
Julia RotowLowe Center for Thoracic Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Pasi A JänneLowe Center for Thoracic Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Mari Mino-KenudsonDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Scott SwansonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Cameron D WrightDepartment of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
David KozonoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Paul MarcouxLowe Center for Thoracic Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Zofia PiotrowskaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Lecia V SequistDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Henning WillersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in early-stage and metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is established, but it remains unknown how best to integrate TKIs with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in locally advanced disease. The phase 2 ASCENT trial assessed the efficacy and safety of afatinib and cCRT with or without surgery in locally advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC. PATIENTS AND

methodsAdults ≥18 years with histologically confirmed stage III (AJCC 7th edition) NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations were enrolled at Mass General and Dana-Farber/Brigham Cancer Centers, Boston, Massachusetts. Patients received induction afatinib 40 mg daily for 2 months, then cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks during RT (definitive or neoadjuvant dosing). Patients with resectable disease underwent surgery. All patients were offered consolidation afatinib for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) to induction TKI. Secondary endpoints were safety, conversion to operability, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Analyses were performed on the intention-to-treat population.

resultsNineteen patients (median age 56 years; 74% female) were enrolled. ORR to induction afatinib was 63%. Seventeen patients received cCRT; 2/9 previously unresectable became resectable. Ten underwent surgery; 6 had a major or complete pathological response. Thirteen received consolidation afatinib. With a median follow-up of 5.0 years, median PFS and OS were 2.6 (95% CI, 1.4-3.1) and 5.8 years (2.9-NR), respectively. Sixteen recurred or died; 6 recurrences were isolated to CNS. The median time to progression after stopping consolidation TKI was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.1-7.2). Four developed grade 2 pneumonitis. There were no treatment-related deaths.

conclusionWe explored the efficacy of combining TKI with cCRT in oncogene-driven NSCLC. Induction TKI did not compromise subsequent receipt of multimodality therapy. PFS was promising, but the prevalence of CNS-only recurrences and rapid progression after TKI discontinuation speak to unmet needs in measuring and eradicating micrometastatic disease.

Indexed as

AfatinibCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemoradiotherapyErbB ReceptorsLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm StagingAfatinibEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsEGFR-mutantlung canceroncogenesradiation oncologystage IIIsurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID38761385
PMCPMC11224994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.