Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38761304›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2024

Measurement of paracentral stereopsis using a new method with the binocular open perimeter imovifa

Akemi Wakayama, Chota Matsumoto, Keisuke Utamura, Ryo Narita, Shunji Kusaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akemi WakayamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osakasayama City, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. akemi-wakayama@med.kindai.ac.jp.
Chota MatsumotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osakasayama City, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Keisuke UtamuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osakasayama City, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Ryo NaritaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osakasayama City, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Shunji KusakaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osakasayama City, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNo method to quantitatively evaluate stereopsis within the 15º visual field has been clinically established. We developed a program to measure paracentral stereopsis and evaluated its feasibility in visually normal participants. STUDY

designExperimental investigation

methodsTen visually normal volunteers with stereopsis of 60 arcseconds or better were included. The Stereo Eccentricity Analysis (SEA) program for stereopsis measurement across the visual field was integrated into the binocular visual field analyzer imovifa

resultsThe stereo thresholds at 0º and 3° did not significantly differ. The thresholds at 10º and 15º were significantly higher than at 0° (P < 0.01). While no inter-individual threshold difference was observed at the fovea, the difference was large at 15°. The stereo thresholds for the detection and localization tasks also did not differ significantly.

conclusionWith the SEA program, paracentral stereopsis can be measured and the stereo threshold increases with eccentricity. The SEA program appears to be a feasible clinical method to evaluate paracentral stereopsis.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionVision, BinocularVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleReference ValuesYoung AdultBinocular disparityParacentral stereopsisPerimeterStereopsisVisual field

Identifiers

PMID38761304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.