ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024
Personalized Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in Frail Patients.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for infections in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in the application of frailty scoring in the diagnosis and management of elderly patients with multiple myeloma (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Prognostic Significance of SGK1 Expression in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Stem cells international · 2026Article
- Combining IMWG GA and hematopoietic score to optimize the evaluation of dynamic chemotherapy tolerance in multiple myeloma.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- PI3K Signaling Pathway Inhibitor Affects Myeloma Cells in a Culture-Dependent Manner.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk Factors and Predictive Model for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAs the treatment landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to expand at a rapid pace, management of older adults and frail patients becomes increasingly challenging. As these patients have traditionally been underrepresented on clinical trials, there is limited guidance on the optimal approach to frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). RECENT
findingsFrailty is an independent predictor of tolerability and response to antineoplastic treatment. Stringent eligibility criteria have often excluded these patients, but recently some large trials have included frailty sub-analyses to help guide management. In general, triplet regimens are preferred to doublet regimens in this population and enrollment on a clinical trial should be prioritized when possible. In this review, we summarize the MM frailty scoring tools that have been developed to identify and assess this vulnerable population. We present the clinical trials over the past decade that have enrolled frail patients and/or have included subgroup analyses to help elucidate the response and tolerability of different regimens in this underrepresented group. We provide practical advice regarding assessment and management of frail patients NDMM and RRMM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38761302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.