Analysis of the perivascular fat attenuation index and quantitative plaque parameters in relation to haemodynamically impaired myocardial ischaemia.

To investigate the correlation between quantitative plaque parameters, the perivascular fat attenuation index, and myocardial ischaemia caused by haemodynamic impairment. Patients with stable angina who had invasive flow reserve fraction (FFR) assessment and coronary artery computed tomography (CT) angiography were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 138 patients were included in this study, which were categorized into the FFR < 0.75 group (n = 43), 0.75 ≤ FFR ≤ 0.8 group (n = 37), and FFR > 0.8 group (n = 58), depending on the range of FFR values. The perivascular FAI and CTA-derived parameters, including plaque length (PL), total plaque volume (TPV), minimum lumen area (MLA), and narrowest degree (ND), were recorded for the lesions. An FFR < 0.75 was defined as myocardial-specific ischaemia. The relationships between myocardial ischaemia and parameters such as the PL, TPV, MLA, ND, and FAI were analysed using a logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the diagnostic accuracy of various indicators for myocardial ischaemia. The PL, TPV, ND, and FAI were greater in the FFR < 0.75 group than in the grey area group and the FFR > 0.80 group (all p < 0.05). The MLA in the FFR < 0.75 group was lower than that in the grey area group and the FFR > 0.80 group (both P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the PL, TPV, or ND between the grey area and the FFR > 0.80 group, but there was a significant difference in the FAI. The coronary artery lesions with FFRs ≤ 0.75 had the greatest FAI values. Multivariate analysis revealed that the perivascular FAI and PL density are significant predictors of myocardial ischaemia. The FAI has some predictive value for myocardial ischaemia (AUC = 0.781). After building a combination model using the FAI and plaque length, the predictive power increased (AUC, 0.781 vs. 0.918), and the change was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The combined model of PL + FAI demonstrated great diagnostic efficacy in identifying myocardial ischaemia caused by haemodynamic impairment; the lower the FFR was, the greater the FAI. Thus, the PL + FAI could be a combined measure to securely rule out myocardial ischaemia.