Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38761271›Full record

SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2024

The use of indocyanine green for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer-preliminary data from an emerging procedure: a systematic review of the literature.

D Kehagias, C Lampropoulos, A Bellou, I Kehagias

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D KehagiasDepartment of General Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, University of Patras, 26504, Rio, Greece. dimikech@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7691-6355
C LampropoulosIntensive Care Unit, Saint Andrew's General Hospital, 26335, Patras, Greece.
A BellouIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, General University Hospital of Patras, 26504, Rio, Greece.
I KehagiasDepartment of General Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, 26504, Rio, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer is still not a widely established technique owing to the existing controversy between Eastern and Western countries and the lack of well-designed studies. The risk of complications and the paucity of long-term oncological results are significant drawbacks for further applying this technique. The use of indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence for LLND appears as a promising technique for enhancing postoperative and oncological outcomes. This review aims to evaluate the emerging role of ICG during LLND and present the benefits of its application. MATERIALS AND

methodsSystematic electronic research was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH). Studies presenting the use of ICG during LLND, especially in terms of harvested lymph nodes, were included and reviewed. Studies comparing LLND with ICG (LLND + ICG) or without ICG (LLND-alone) were further analyzed for the number of lymph nodes and postoperative outcomes.

resultsIn total, 13 studies were found eligible and analyzed for different parameters. LLND + ICG is associated with significantly increased number of harvested lateral lymph nodes (p < 0.05), minor blood loss, decreased operative time, and probably decreased urinary retention postoperatively compared with LLND-alone.

conclusionsThe use of ICG fluorescence during LLND is a safe and feasible technique for balancing postoperative outcomes and the number of harvested lymph nodes. Well-designed studies with long-term results are required to elucidate the oncological benefits and establish this promising technique.

Indexed as

Indocyanine GreenLymph Node ExcisionRectal NeoplasmsBlood Loss, SurgicalColoring AgentsFemaleFluorescent DyesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleOperative TimeTreatment OutcomeColoring AgentsFluorescent DyesIndocyanine GreenColorectal surgeryFluorescenceIndocyanine greenLateral lymph node dissectionRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID38761271
PMCPMC11102372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.