Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38761229›Full record

ArticleHNO2024

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps-extension of dupilumab treatment intervals].

H M Appel, R Lochbaum, T K Hoffmann, J Hahn

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Dupilumab Extended Interval Dosing in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H M AppelUniversitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland. heike.appel@uniklinik-ulm.de.
R LochbaumUniversitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland.
T K HoffmannUniversitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland.
J HahnUniversitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks can completely resolve nasal polys, sinus disease, and symptoms. In this case, patients ask for de-escalation. Although trials have demonstrated recurrence after stopping the biologic at 24 weeks, reducing the dose of dupilumab to once every 4 weeks did not result in deterioration of control. An extension of the treatment intervals would, however, diverge from the approval text, and is currently not recommended.

methodsThe course of 29 patients with severe CRSwNP, type‑2 inflammation-associated comorbidities, and an indication for biologic was retrospectively analyzed. After resolution of CRSwNP and symptoms under biweekly dupilumab 300 mg, the dupilumab interval had been prolonged individually, initially up to 4 weeks, thereafter up to 6 weeks, if applicable. Control was assessed via quality of life (22-item sinonasal outcome test, SNOT-22), nasal polyp score, and smell identification test (Sniffin' Sticks; Burghart Messtechnik, Holm, Germany).

resultsAll patients showed an excellent improvement within the first 3 months. The dupilumab application interval was extended to 4 weeks after 7-31 months (median 13 months) and to 6 weeks (n = 9) after 17-35 months (median 23 months). No recurrent polyps or symptoms were subsequently observed.

conclusionIn case of maximal regression of polyps and discomfort, extension of dupilumab injection intervals to 4 and potentially 6 weeks is possible without clinical worsening. Further studies on de-escalation or termination of biologic treatment when CRSwNP control is achieved are essential.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedNasal PolypsRhinitisSinusitisAdultAgedChronic DiseaseDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRhinosinusitisTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddupilumabAsthmaBiologic drugsMonoclonal humanized antibodiesNose diseasesRhinitis

Identifiers

PMID38761229
PMCPMC11192668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.