Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760874›Full record

ArticleHereditas2024

Comparative chloroplast-specific SNP and nSCoT markers analysis and population structure study in kiwifruit plants.

Yinling Ding, Yu Wang, Zhe Chen, Jiamin Dou, Yihao Zhang, Yu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yinling DingSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yu WangSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province, China.
Zhe ChenSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province, China.
Jiamin DouSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yihao ZhangSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yu ZhangSchool of Biological Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi Province, China. yuzhang20160315@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5379-6773

Funding

Scientist + Engineer' Team for "Research on Development of Wild Resources and Creation of New Materials of High Quality Kiwifruit in Qinba Region 2023KXJ-138Study and application of irradiation breeding of high quality and multi resistance kiwifruit varieties SXC-2102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKiwifruit (Actinidiaceae family) is an economically important fruit tree in China and New Zealand. It is a typical dioecious plant that has undergone frequent natural hybridization, along with chromosomal ploidy diversity within the genus Actinidia, resulting in higher genetic differences and horticultural diversity between interspecific and intraspecific traits. This diversity provides a rich genetic base for breeding. China is not only the original center of speciation for the Actinidia genus but also its distribution center, housing the most domesticated species: A. chinensis var. chinensis, A. chinensis var. deliciosa, A. arguta, and A. polygama. However, there have been relatively few studies on the application of DNA markers and the genetic basis of kiwifruit plants. By combining information from chloroplast-specific SNPs and nuclear SCoT (nSCoT) markers, we can uncover complementary aspects of genetic variation, population structure, and evolutionary relationships. In this study, one chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) marker pair was selected out of nine cpDNA candidate pairs. Twenty nSCoT markers were selected and used to assess the population structure and chloroplast-specific DNA haplotype diversity in 55 kiwifruit plants (Actinidia), including 20 samples of A. chinensis var. chinensis, 22 samples of A. chinensis var. deliciosa, 11 samples of A. arguta, and two samples of A. polygama, based on morphological observations collected from China.

resultsThe average genetic distance among the 55 samples was 0.26 with chloroplast-specific SNP markers and 0.57 with nSCoT markers. The Mantel test revealed a very small correlation (r = 0.21). The 55 samples were categorized into different sub-populations using Bayesian analysis, the Unweighted Pair Group Method with the Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA), and the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method, respectively. Based on the analysis of 205 variable sites, a total of 15 chloroplast-specific DNA haplotypes were observed, contributing to a higher level of polymorphism with an Hd of 0.78. Most of the chloroplast-specific DNA haplotype diversity was distributed among populations, but significant diversity was also observed within populations. H1 was shared by 24 samples, including 12 of A. chinensis var. chinensis and 12 of A. chinensis var. deliciosa, indicating that H1 is an ancient and dominant haplotype among the 55 chloroplast-specific sequences. H2 may not have evolved further.The remaining haplotypes were rare and unique, with some appearing to be exclusive to a particular variety and often detected in single individuals. For example, the H15 haplotype was found exclusively in A. polygama.

conclusionThe population genetic variation explained by chloroplast-specific SNP markers has greater power than that explained by nSCoTs, with chloroplast-specific DNA haplotypes being the most efficient. Gene flow appears to be more evident between A. chinensis var. chinensis and A. chinensis var. deliciosa, as they share chloroplast-specific DNA haplotypes, In contrast, A.arguta and A. polygama possess their own characteristic haplotypes, derived from the haplotype of A. chinensis var. chinensis. Compared with A. chinensis, the A.arguta and A. polygama showed better grouping. It also seems crucial to screen out, for each type of molecular marker, especially haplotypes, the core markers of the Actinidia genus.

Indexed as

ActinidiaChloroplastsDNA, ChloroplastHaplotypesPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChinaGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationDNA, ChloroplastGenetic MarkersActinidiaChloroplast-specific DNA haplotype diversityChloroplast-specific SNPnSCoTPopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID38760874
PMCPMC11102262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.