Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760835›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2024

Metabolic landscape and pathogenic insights: a comprehensive analysis of high ovarian response in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Ling-Ling Ruan, Xing-Yu Lv, Yu-Lin Hu, Ming-Xing Chen, Jing-Tang, Zhao-Hui Zhong, Mei-Hua Bao, Li-Juan Fu, Xin Luo, Shao-Min Yu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ling-Ling RuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 23 Central Park North Road, Yubei District, Chongqing, 401147, PR China.
Xing-Yu LvThe Reproductive Center, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Children's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610011, China.
Yu-Lin HuThe Reproductive Center, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Children's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610011, China.
Ming-Xing ChenJoint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Jing-TangDepartment of Bioinformatics, School of Basic Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.
Zhao-Hui ZhongJoint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Mei-Hua BaoDepartment of Pharmacology, Academician Workstation, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, 410219, China.
Li-Juan FuJoint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Xin LuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Shao-Min YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the People's Hospital of Yubei District, No. 23 Central Park North Road, Chongqing, 401120, China. snyz@qq.com.
Qi WanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. wanqi123@163.com.
Yu-Bin DingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 23 Central Park North Road, Yubei District, Chongqing, 401147, PR China. dingyb@cqmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China no. 2023YFC2705900National Natural Science Foundation of China nos. 82171664National Natural Science Foundation of China nos. 82171668Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality of China nos. CSTB2022NSCQ-LZX0062Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality of China nos. CSTB2023TIAD-KPX0052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the realm of assisted reproduction, a subset of infertile patients demonstrates high ovarian response following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), with approximately 29.7% facing the risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS). Management of OHSS risk often necessitates embryo transfer cancellation, leading to delayed prospects of successful pregnancy and significant psychological distress. Regrettably, these patients have received limited research attention, particularly regarding their metabolic profile. In this study, we aim to utilize gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to reveal these patients' unique serum metabolic profiles and provide insights into the disease's pathogenesis.

methodsWe categorized 145 infertile women into two main groups: the CON infertility group from tubal infertility patients and the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) infertility group. Within these groups, we further subdivided them into four categories: patients with normal ovarian response (CON-NOR group), patients with high ovarian response and at risk for OHSS (CON-HOR group) within the CON group, as well as patients with normal ovarian response (PCOS-NOR group) and patients with high ovarian response and at risk for OHSS (PCOS-HOR group) within the PCOS group. Serum metabolic profiles were analyzed using GC-MS. The risk criteria for OHSS were: the number of developing follicles > 20, peak Estradiol (E2) > 4000pg/mL, and Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels > 4.5ng/mL.

resultsThe serum metabolomics analysis revealed four different metabolites within the CON group and 14 within the PCOS group. Remarkably, 10-pentadecenoic acid emerged as a discernible risk metabolite for the CON-HOR, also found to be a differential metabolite between CON-NOR and PCOS groups. cysteine and 5-methoxytryptamine were also identified as risk metabolites for the PCOS-HOR. Furthermore, KEGG analysis unveiled significant enrichment of the aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis pathway among the metabolites differing between PCOS-NOR and PCOS-HOR.

conclusionOur study highlights significant metabolite differences between patients with normal ovarian response and those with high ovarian response and at risk for OHSS within both the tubal infertility control group and PCOS infertility group. Importantly, we observe metabolic similarities between patients with PCOS and those with a high ovarian response but without PCOS, suggesting potential parallels in their underlying causes.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroInfertility, FemaleOvulation InductionAdultFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMetabolomeMetabolomicsOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeOvaryPolycystic Ovary SyndromePregnancyHigh ovarian responseMetabolomePolycystic ovary syndromeSerum

Identifiers

PMID38760835
PMCPMC11102248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.