Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760824›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2024

A qualitative exploration of health care workers' approaches to relational harm reduction in HIV primary care settings.

Emma Sophia Kay, Stephanie L Creasy, Jessica Townsend, Mary Hawk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma Sophia KaySchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1701 University Blvd., Birmingham, Alabama, AL, 35294, USA. emmakay@uab.edu.
Stephanie L CreasyDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jessica TownsendSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1701 University Blvd., Birmingham, Alabama, AL, 35294, USA.
Mary HawkDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

The Brown Initiative in HIV and AIDS Clinical Research for Minority CommunitiesR25MH083620 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI NUNN, AMY STEWART · 2008 to 2025
$3.7M
Impact of harm reduction care in HIV clinical settings on stigma and health outcomes for PLWH who use drugsR01DA054832 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HAWK, MARY ELIZABETH, KAY, EMMA SOPHIA · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054832NIH HHS 1R01DA054832-01NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH083620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructural harm reduction is an approach to care for people who use drugs (PWUD) that incorporates services and resources (e.g., naloxone, sterile syringes). As conceptualized in our previous research, harm reduction is also "relational," encompassing a patient-provider relationship that is non-judgmental and respectful of patients' autonomy. Little is known about health care workers' (HCW) knowledge or attitudes towards harm reduction beyond structural strategies, whose availability and legality vary across geographical settings. To operationalize how relational harm reduction is both characterized and employed in HIV care settings, where nearly half of patients have a diagnosed substance use disorder, we qualitatively explored HCWs' knowledge of and use of harm reduction via individual in-depth interviews.

methodsOur study sample included three HIV clinics, one in Birmingham, Alabama (AL) and two in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (PA). We conducted individual interviews with n = 23 health care workers via Zoom, using a semi-structured interview guide to probe for questions around health care workers' attitudes towards and experiences with providing care to PWH who use drugs and their knowledge of and attitudes towards relational and structural harm reduction. Data was analyzed in Dedoose using thematic analysis.

resultsQualitative analyses revealed two primary themes, Continuum of Relational Harm Reduction in Practice and Limited Harm Reduction Training. Nearly all HCWs (n = 19, 83%) described a patient interaction or expressed a sentiment that corresponded with the principles of relational harm reduction. Yet, over half of participants (n = 14, 61%) used language to describe PWH who use drugs that was stigmatizing or described an interaction that was antithetical to the principles of relational harm reduction. Five HCWs, all from Birmingham, were unaware of the term 'harm reduction.' Few HCWs had any harm reduction training, with most learning about harm reduction from webinars/conferences or on the job.

conclusionOur findings suggest that relational harm reduction in HIV care settings is practiced along a continuum, and that a range of behaviors exist even within individual HCWs (e.g., used stigmatizing terms such as "addict" but also described patient interactions that reflected patients' autonomy). Given that harm reduction is typically described as a structural approach, a broader definition of harm reduction that is not dependent on policy-dependent resources is needed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHarm ReductionHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID38760824
PMCPMC11100089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.