ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
MRI reconstruction with enhanced self-similarity using graph convolutional network.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation and feasibility of fast knee MRI using a deep learning-assisted 3D iterative image enhancement system.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Advancing MRI Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Deep Learning and Compressed Sensing Integration.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) perform low-error reconstruction in fast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Most of them convolve the image with kernels and successfully explore the local information. Nonetheless, the non-local image information, which is embedded among image patches relatively far from each other, may be lost due to the limitation of the receptive field of the convolution kernel. We aim to incorporate a graph to represent non-local information and improve the reconstructed images by using the Graph Convolutional Enhanced Self-Similarity (GCESS) network.
methodsFirst, the image is reconstructed into the graph to extract the non-local self-similarity in the image. Second, GCESS uses spatial convolution and graph convolution to process the information in the image, so that local and non-local information can be effectively utilized. The network strengthens the non-local similarity between similar image patches while reconstructing images, making the reconstruction of structure more reliable.
resultsExperimental results on in vivo knee and brain data demonstrate that the proposed method achieves better artifact suppression and detail preservation than state-of-the-art methods, both visually and quantitatively. Under 1D Cartesian sampling with 4 × acceleration (AF = 4), the PSNR of knee data reached 34.19 dB, 1.05 dB higher than that of the compared methods; the SSIM achieved 0.8994, 2% higher than the compared methods. Similar results were obtained for the reconstructed images under other sampling templates as demonstrated in our experiment.
conclusionsThe proposed method successfully constructs a hybrid graph convolution and spatial convolution network to reconstruct images. This method, through its training process, amplifies the non-local self-similarities, significantly benefiting the structural integrity of the reconstructed images. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art reconstruction method in suppressing artifacts, as well as in preserving image details.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.