Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760775›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Towards inclusive learning environments in post-graduate medical education: stakeholder-driven strategies in Dutch GP-specialty training.

N M van Moppes, M Nasori, J Bont, J M van Es, M R M Visser, M E T C van den Muijsenbergh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N M van MoppesAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands. n.m.vanmoppes@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3457-7724
M NasoriAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-1791
J BontAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-0235
J M van EsAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
M R M VisserAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
M E T C van den MuijsenberghDepartment of General Practice, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-4008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent study found that ethnic minority General Practice (GP)-trainees receive more negative assessments than their majority peers. Previous qualitative research suggested that learning climate-related factors play a pivotal role in unequal opportunities for trainees in post-graduate medical settings, indicating that insufficient inclusivity had put minority students at risk of failure and dropout. STUDY

objectivesWe aimed to develop broadly supported strategies for an inclusive learning climate in Dutch GP-specialty training.

methodsWe employed Participatory Action Research (PAR)-methods, incorporating Participatory Learning and Action (PLA)-techniques to ensure equal voices for all stakeholders in shaping Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)-strategies for GP-specialty training. Our approach engaged stakeholders within two pilot GP-specialty training institutes across diverse roles, including management, support staff, in-faculty teachers, in-clinic supervisors, and trainees, representing ethnic minorities and the majority population. Purposeful convenience sampling formed stakeholder- and co-reader groups in two Dutch GP-specialty training institutes. Stakeholder discussion sessions were based on experiences and literature, including two relevant frameworks, and explored perspectives on the dynamics of potential ethnic minority trainees' disadvantages and opportunities for inclusive strategies. A co-reader group commented on discussion outcomes. Consequently, a management group prioritized suggested strategies based on expected feasibility and compatibility.

resultsInput from twelve stakeholder group sessions and thirteen co-readers led to implementation guidance for seven inclusive learning environment strategies, of which the management group prioritized three: • Provide DEI-relevant training programs to all GP-specialty training stakeholders; • Appoint DEI ambassadors in all layers of GP-specialty training; • Give a significant voice to minority GP-trainees in their education.

conclusionThe study's participatory approach engaged representatives of all GP-specialty training stakeholders and identified seven inclusive learning climate strategies, of which three were prioritized for implementation in two training institutions.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateGeneral PracticeCultural DiversityEthnicityHumansLearningMinority GroupsNetherlandsStakeholder ParticipationGP-specialty TrainingInclusive Medical EducationStakeholder-driven Strategies

Identifiers

PMID38760775
PMCPMC11100146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.