Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38760759›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Assessing family function: older adults vs. care nurses: a cross-sectional comparative study.

Mei-Wen Wang, Ya-Mei Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mei-Wen WangDepartment of Family Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan R.O.C.. smilebaby0414@gmail.com.
Ya-Mei ChenCollege of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C.

Funding

Chang Gung Medical Research Council, Taiwan CLRPG2C0024, CMRPG2H0111, and CMRPG2K0111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess family function in home care for older adults. Understanding family dynamics is essential for providing quality care to older adults choosing to age in place.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study, 53 patients aged 65 or older receiving home care were evaluated, along with four home care nurses. The General Function of Family Assessment Device (FAD-GF) was used for self-assessment to examine family resources.

resultsOnly 5.7% of older adults reported good family function. Strong correlations were found between assessments by nurses and older adults. Among the six aspects of family function, "problem solving," "communication," "affective responsiveness," and the overall results showed no disparities between the evaluations of older adults and nurses.

conclusionsHome care nurses can effectively assess family function using the FAD-GF, particularly after six months of care. This assessment can help identify family issues and enhance home care quality through nurse training in FAD-GF application.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFamily RelationsFemaleHumansMaleGeneral function of family assessment deviceGeriatricHome-boundHome nursing careOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID38760759
PMCPMC11100032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.